WEBVTT 00:00.910 --> 00:07.220 Prof: All right we have here forth flown at a relatively 00:07.223 --> 00:12.623 high altitude with the likes of Adam Smith, Carl Marx, 00:12.620 --> 00:15.370 Joseph Schumpeter, F.A. 00:15.370 --> 00:20.390 Hayek, and today and continuing from here to the mid-term, 00:20.386 --> 00:24.166 we're going to deal with real businesses. 00:24.170 --> 00:32.590 And it is our considerable privilege to have with us Sharon 00:32.592 --> 00:36.462 Oster, who is a Harvard PhD in 00:36.463 --> 00:42.593 Economics, is widely thought to be the wisest owl on the 00:42.594 --> 00:48.504 management of non-profit organizations anywhere in the 00:48.502 --> 00:51.892 world, and is the Frederick Wolf 00:51.890 --> 00:56.810 Professor of Entrepreneurship at the School of Management, 00:56.810 --> 01:01.260 and is, in addition to that, a dean of that school. 01:01.259 --> 01:10.089 So please help me welcome Sharon Oster. 01:10.090 --> 01:12.280 Sharon Oster: Thank you all. 01:12.280 --> 01:16.160 In my youth I taught at Yale College and I taught generations 01:16.155 --> 01:18.475 of undergrads intermediate micro, 01:18.480 --> 01:21.810 so it's nice to be back amongst you, 01:21.810 --> 01:24.680 teaching something a little bit about economics. 01:24.680 --> 01:27.250 I hope Doug warned you, but I'm going to treat it like 01:27.250 --> 01:30.330 a business school class, which means I'm going to cold 01:30.333 --> 01:32.523 call on you, and people in the back should 01:32.516 --> 01:35.026 know that I especially like calling on the people in the 01:35.031 --> 01:37.091 back because they tend to doze otherwise, 01:37.090 --> 01:39.960 so you might want to change your seat. 01:39.959 --> 01:44.389 So let's think about this case a little bit. 01:44.390 --> 01:47.170 So imagine yourself, you're one of the three 01:47.167 --> 01:49.877 entrepreneurs Ferrari, Gold, and Dillon. 01:49.879 --> 01:53.889 The world is your oyster in some sense. 01:53.890 --> 01:55.630 Here you are, you've founded this firm, 01:55.629 --> 01:59.449 you've got a product that's this kit that can be used in 01:59.449 --> 02:02.659 heart surgery, big market, there's a million 02:02.659 --> 02:06.429 people who need heart disease-- who need some kind of heart 02:06.427 --> 02:08.607 surgery every year; growing market, 02:08.613 --> 02:11.463 we're all getting fatter, we're getting older, 02:11.457 --> 02:13.777 we're getting weaker, we're getting less healthy, 02:13.782 --> 02:16.302 you might think that's a problem for President Obama and 02:16.295 --> 02:18.345 the healthcare but it's an opportunity for our 02:18.351 --> 02:19.221 entrepreneurs. 02:19.220 --> 02:22.480 This is a--even in the U.S. 02:22.479 --> 02:26.169 they could imagine a billion dollar market in this business, 02:26.169 --> 02:27.659 not to mention the rest of the world, 02:27.658 --> 02:30.768 where people are also overeating and getting less and 02:30.772 --> 02:32.272 less healthy over time. 02:32.270 --> 02:37.160 Yet when the case opens, they seem like they have some 02:37.163 --> 02:39.383 worries on their mind. 02:39.378 --> 02:43.538 So if you were one of those individuals, guys in this case, 02:43.538 --> 02:45.688 what are you thinking about? 02:45.690 --> 02:47.990 Student: Marketing. 02:47.990 --> 02:50.240 Sharon Oster: Okay, so what do you mean 02:50.244 --> 02:50.984 by marketing? 02:50.979 --> 02:52.539 What's the issue? 02:52.538 --> 02:56.408 Student: Well, the issue is you have this 02:56.413 --> 02:58.933 product, which could potentially be made 02:58.926 --> 03:01.256 into a lot of money and help out consumers, 03:01.258 --> 03:02.588 but you have to work through physicians, 03:02.590 --> 03:06.750 since they're the ones who were actually using this device, 03:06.750 --> 03:09.190 and for them to use the device, they need training. 03:09.188 --> 03:11.378 Sharon Oster: Okay, so one set of 03:11.379 --> 03:14.719 questions we're going to have are a set of questions about the 03:14.722 --> 03:15.272 buyer. 03:15.270 --> 03:17.990 There are going to be a lot of questions about the buyer but 03:17.994 --> 03:20.864 let's just get that up there as one set of things we're worried 03:20.858 --> 03:21.318 about. 03:21.319 --> 03:22.639 What are you worried about? 03:22.639 --> 03:25.589 Student: I guess I'd be worried about the 03:25.586 --> 03:29.386 competitiveness of my product to make sure that it can actually 03:29.393 --> 03:30.993 compete on the market. 03:30.990 --> 03:31.740 Sharon Oster: Good. 03:31.740 --> 03:35.000 So you know at the moment--let her have it, 03:35.000 --> 03:40.020 she's doing okay--so at the moment I only have one 03:40.015 --> 03:42.735 competitor, so what would we call that if 03:42.741 --> 03:43.991 we were in economics class? 03:43.990 --> 03:45.690 Student: A duopoly. 03:45.690 --> 03:46.680 Sharon Oster: A duopoly okay. 03:46.680 --> 03:48.910 Now one of the things we know about duopolies, 03:48.914 --> 03:52.044 if they're any kind of sensible duopolies they're probably doing 03:52.044 --> 03:52.844 pretty well. 03:52.840 --> 03:54.840 This duopolist, my competitor, 03:54.842 --> 03:57.262 what's his price point look like? 03:57.259 --> 03:59.129 Student: Price point? 03:59.128 --> 04:01.218 Sharon Oster: Yeah so he--I'm charging 04:01.223 --> 04:03.183 $1,000 for my thing, what's he charging? 04:03.180 --> 04:04.430 Anybody remember the number? 04:04.430 --> 04:05.330 Student: $5,000. 04:05.330 --> 04:06.630 Sharon Oster: $5,000--they're good they 04:06.627 --> 04:07.137 know the numbers.. 04:07.135 --> 04:08.345 Prof: I told you they were good. 04:08.348 --> 04:10.318 Sharon Oster: So I'm thinking to myself 04:10.318 --> 04:12.028 you're worried about the competition, 04:12.030 --> 04:15.100 but I got one competitor and he's charging five times my 04:15.097 --> 04:17.827 price, that makes me look like I'm 04:17.827 --> 04:18.897 pretty good. 04:18.899 --> 04:21.209 Is there something else you're worried about? 04:21.209 --> 04:24.639 Student: Well it's not just that one competitor, 04:24.636 --> 04:26.626 but its other techniques also. 04:26.629 --> 04:27.549 Sharon Oster: Good. 04:27.550 --> 04:33.060 Okay, so one thing I'm worried about right now is my existing 04:33.055 --> 04:36.145 competitor, but Schumpeter doesn't tell me 04:36.149 --> 04:39.409 that I should only worry about a static competition, 04:39.410 --> 04:40.250 does he? 04:40.250 --> 04:43.250 What is Schumpeter's model about what's happening with 04:43.254 --> 04:44.054 competition? 04:44.050 --> 04:47.640 Student: Creative destruction to the other firms 04:47.639 --> 04:51.559 that went to market and less successful firms were forced out 04:51.555 --> 04:52.725 of the market. 04:52.730 --> 04:55.190 Sharon Oster: So a thing that I have to 04:55.192 --> 04:58.462 worry about is not just the extant competitor's Heartport, 04:58.459 --> 05:01.709 but I better think a little bit about who else is coming, 05:01.709 --> 05:06.089 so I'm going to be thinking a little bit about what Michael 05:06.093 --> 05:08.673 Porter, who you also looked at I guess, 05:08.673 --> 05:11.503 is new entry and how do I understand new entry? 05:11.500 --> 05:16.000 Then if I think about the flip side of Schumpeter not only am I 05:15.997 --> 05:20.277 worried about some new guys coming in and destroying me, 05:20.278 --> 05:25.018 but as I come in I'm of course competing against some existing 05:25.021 --> 05:25.801 players. 05:25.800 --> 05:32.080 I need to think a little bit existing players and the way in 05:32.084 --> 05:36.244 which they are attacking this market. 05:36.240 --> 05:39.620 One of the things you're going to observe about almost every 05:39.622 --> 05:41.862 new product as it enters the market, 05:41.860 --> 05:45.800 even if it thinks of itself as a new product it has existing 05:45.803 --> 05:46.743 competitors. 05:46.740 --> 05:49.840 Many of you may have Kindles, if you look at Kindles the 05:49.836 --> 05:53.376 Kindle is obviously also worried about what's happening with the 05:53.384 --> 05:56.994 Sony Reader and all the new things that look like a Kindle, 05:56.990 --> 05:59.000 but really from the point of Kindle's-- 05:59.000 --> 06:01.870 from Kindle's point of view its real job at the moment is 06:01.865 --> 06:05.135 converting all those people who are buying hard covered books. 06:05.139 --> 06:09.729 It is thinking a little bit about conversion of consumers 06:09.726 --> 06:14.386 from the way in which they are currently used to solving a 06:14.394 --> 06:18.494 problem to your new way of solving a problem, 06:18.490 --> 06:21.630 so we're going to have to think here in competition not only 06:21.634 --> 06:23.984 about the guys that are doing it our way, 06:23.980 --> 06:25.260 but the existing players. 06:25.259 --> 06:28.709 And we're going to have to think about these things in the 06:28.714 --> 06:31.994 context of a set of issues involving the customers, 06:31.990 --> 06:35.750 how I connect to the customers, how I deliver to whoever these 06:35.750 --> 06:37.770 customers are, and we'll have to think about 06:37.766 --> 06:41.456 that, and a set of different products 06:41.461 --> 06:44.701 for the needs of our people. 06:44.699 --> 06:48.969 I'm going to stay with those two things for awhile and then 06:48.968 --> 06:53.238 Doug will help me pull down the slides to get to some other 06:53.235 --> 06:56.075 questions in the end, but this is going to take care 06:56.076 --> 06:56.876 of us for a little while. 06:56.879 --> 06:59.709 Let's stick with the competition part of it first. 06:59.709 --> 07:03.769 Before I came along, kind of how is it that people 07:03.773 --> 07:06.513 got their heart problem solved? 07:06.509 --> 07:08.279 Guy in the back with the pink shirt in the last row. 07:08.278 --> 07:14.148 Student: Either bypass surgery or the balloon 07:14.146 --> 07:15.496 procedure. 07:15.500 --> 07:17.540 Sharon Oster: Good and do you have a 07:17.541 --> 07:19.781 vague idea about of these one million patients, 07:19.778 --> 07:21.188 about how they divide up? 07:21.189 --> 07:24.069 Student: I don't know. 07:24.069 --> 07:25.359 Sharon Oster: Anybody else remember 07:25.363 --> 07:25.983 about the numbers? 07:25.980 --> 07:32.750 They're not perfect; so the CABG is about 350,000 07:32.747 --> 07:36.357 and the angioplasty-- Prof: There is some 07:36.363 --> 07:38.083 hands up; we got to get them to where she can see. 07:38.079 --> 07:39.389 Sharon Oster: Oh, if it's a number like 07:39.387 --> 07:40.097 that you can just yell. 07:40.100 --> 07:41.720 You don't even have to raise your hand. 07:41.720 --> 07:44.040 We're a much more casual group than that in business school. 07:44.040 --> 07:47.440 I've got two different ways of doing it; 07:47.440 --> 07:49.470 let's stick with you, do you got the mic handy? 07:49.470 --> 07:50.410 Good. 07:50.410 --> 07:54.160 Tell me a little bit about my organization, 07:54.161 --> 07:58.181 CardioThoracics, competing against competitors 07:58.182 --> 08:01.132 in each of those two markets. 08:01.129 --> 08:04.869 Student: In the first model of cardiothoracic systems, 08:04.870 --> 08:09.780 it only allowed doctors to do surgery on one or two blood 08:09.776 --> 08:13.196 vessels, which would have replaced, 08:13.196 --> 08:16.336 I believe, the market for the balloon 08:16.341 --> 08:18.321 procedure, angioplasty. 08:18.319 --> 08:23.389 Whereas, for the bypass surgery, it was usually, 08:23.389 --> 08:26.229 in that case, because they were creating more 08:26.233 --> 08:28.423 trauma, they would usually try to 08:28.415 --> 08:30.685 address as many vessels as possible. 08:30.689 --> 08:32.469 Sharon Oster: Okay so one of the things 08:32.467 --> 08:34.897 about this particular product is in its infancy it could only do 08:34.904 --> 08:39.034 one or two vessels at a time, and that limited it really 08:39.025 --> 08:43.555 pretty much to this side of the picture, 08:43.558 --> 08:46.138 because most of what we were doing-- 08:46.139 --> 08:49.259 this side of the picture involved, as you indicated, 08:49.259 --> 08:53.099 a little more drastic cutting, and typically then more 08:53.100 --> 08:55.420 treatment of multiple vessels. 08:55.418 --> 09:02.788 Generation 1 sort of focused on this part of the market. 09:02.788 --> 09:07.358 Now, as you indicated, the technological trajectory 09:07.356 --> 09:11.706 was to more and more vessels, so we're going to spend a 09:11.707 --> 09:14.907 little bit of money if we're this firm and we're going to 09:14.908 --> 09:18.108 move to not only solving those problems but solving those 09:18.109 --> 09:18.909 problems. 09:18.908 --> 09:21.628 Does that change come without a cost? 09:21.629 --> 09:24.919 As I move from Generation 1 to Generation 2, 09:24.924 --> 09:28.304 to Generation 3, I get more and more vessels, 09:28.297 --> 09:30.057 do I lose anything? 09:30.058 --> 09:32.778 Student: You have to pay for-- 09:32.779 --> 09:35.709 you have to invest in the product, you have to train and 09:35.707 --> 09:38.277 retrain doctors, you have to market it over and 09:38.277 --> 09:38.897 over again. 09:38.899 --> 09:41.089 Sharon Oster: Okay, so one set of 09:41.087 --> 09:43.707 questions is as I'm doing anything technological, 09:43.714 --> 09:46.454 I'm going to have to invest real cash in this. 09:46.450 --> 09:48.370 I'm going to have to think a little bit about that, 09:48.366 --> 09:50.316 but is there anything else I lose as I move from one 09:50.322 --> 09:51.322 generation to another? 09:51.320 --> 09:54.950 Yeah. 09:54.950 --> 09:57.170 Student: Well it's harder because the whole point 09:57.173 --> 09:59.243 is to have a beating heart so it could be longer, 09:59.240 --> 10:00.690 so it's two different > 10:00.690 --> 10:02.070 Sharon Oster: Okay, well that's true. 10:02.070 --> 10:05.220 It's harder to do more vessels because I've got more things I'm 10:05.216 --> 10:08.426 trying to do as its beating, but there's something else I'm 10:08.427 --> 10:10.717 doing as I move from Generation 1 onward. 10:10.720 --> 10:12.560 Yeah. 10:12.558 --> 10:16.708 Student: > 10:16.710 --> 10:18.680 Sharon Oster: Great, so if you think 10:18.682 --> 10:21.162 about this product in the beginning, it had two kind of 10:21.160 --> 10:22.400 technological features. 10:22.399 --> 10:24.469 One was it dealt with the bleeding heart-- 10:24.470 --> 10:27.950 beating heart, not bleeding heart--and the 10:27.948 --> 10:32.318 second one it had a smaller cut, so you didn't want to cut all 10:32.321 --> 10:34.571 the way through people, you actually wanted to have a 10:34.565 --> 10:36.915 little bitty hole, so small incision, 10:36.923 --> 10:42.223 and it turned out that the beating heart eliminated some of 10:42.220 --> 10:46.480 the neurological problems, and the small incision made 10:46.480 --> 10:48.510 people recover a little bit faster. 10:48.509 --> 10:51.679 So they were different elements of the product that we liked. 10:51.678 --> 10:57.108 When we moved from the kind of only a couple vessels to many 10:57.106 --> 10:59.876 vessels, we're giving up on some of the 10:59.880 --> 11:03.050 functionality associated with the product by cutting up 11:03.052 --> 11:06.402 patients a little bit more and that's another feature that 11:06.399 --> 11:09.099 Schumpeter and others have talked about, 11:09.100 --> 11:12.800 including Clay Christensen, who talks about disruptive 11:12.802 --> 11:17.072 innovation that when you make a product change it is often the 11:17.065 --> 11:19.715 case that you don't just improve, 11:19.720 --> 11:21.160 improve, improve, improve. 11:21.159 --> 11:23.269 You give up things; there are tradeoffs that you're 11:23.273 --> 11:23.523 making. 11:23.519 --> 11:26.049 And the tradeoffs are not just to cost you more money and you 11:26.052 --> 11:29.102 get more functionality, but sometimes you actually push 11:29.101 --> 11:33.071 along one dimension and you're drawing back actually in what-- 11:33.070 --> 11:34.740 in the qualities of another dimension. 11:34.740 --> 11:40.770 In this situation why put the money in and give up the small 11:40.768 --> 11:46.998 incision piece just to enable yourself to move into this piece 11:47.000 --> 11:48.840 of the market? 11:48.840 --> 11:53.040 After all the one or two vessels market is the biggest 11:53.043 --> 11:56.853 chunk of the market and it's pretty darn big, 11:56.850 --> 12:00.320 I'm just a little guy, why don't I manage as I am 12:00.316 --> 12:03.056 focusing on that part of the market? 12:03.058 --> 12:08.068 Why is it I have to go--why is it I decide to transform myself? 12:08.070 --> 12:10.140 Here in the back, the woman in the corner? 12:10.139 --> 12:17.359 Student: Because you have 12:17.356 --> 12:24.346 to--> 12:24.350 --> 12:26.680 Sharon Oster: You have to say that 12:26.683 --> 12:29.653 louder for me or slower, so I got a piece of it but I 12:29.645 --> 12:31.805 didn't get it all, so start again. 12:31.808 --> 12:34.218 Student: You need to think about the preferences of 12:34.221 --> 12:36.311 your consumers, the doctor that are going to be 12:36.311 --> 12:39.031 adopting your technology, you need a larger incision so 12:39.034 --> 12:41.614 they can see the heart that they're working on. 12:41.610 --> 12:44.160 And so it's not just about moving from a couple vessels to 12:44.163 --> 12:46.363 many, it's about catering to their preferences. 12:46.360 --> 12:48.510 Sharon Oster: Okay, so one of the things 12:48.508 --> 12:51.068 I'm going to be thinking about here as I'm thinking about 12:51.067 --> 12:53.167 technologically what to do to my product, 12:53.168 --> 12:57.268 is that when I change what I can do technologically, 12:57.269 --> 13:01.219 I am picking a different set of markets that I'm trying to 13:01.221 --> 13:02.471 compete against. 13:02.470 --> 13:07.270 And these markets are going to look very different in terms of 13:07.272 --> 13:11.132 the kind of buyer issues and the complimentor, 13:11.129 --> 13:13.329 and we'll talk about what I mean by that in a minute, 13:13.330 --> 13:15.930 for each of these two parts of the market. 13:15.928 --> 13:19.988 I am choosing my competition in some sense by choosing my 13:19.986 --> 13:20.926 technology. 13:20.928 --> 13:27.148 I'm choosing to go against here a set of--who's doing these CABG 13:27.150 --> 13:28.040 things? 13:28.038 --> 13:31.368 These are surgeons, so these are surgeons, 13:31.373 --> 13:33.653 they're cutting people up. 13:33.649 --> 13:35.989 Who's doing the angioplasty? 13:35.990 --> 13:37.930 What looks different about that? 13:37.929 --> 13:39.059 Student: Cardiologists. 13:39.058 --> 13:40.368 Sharon Oster: These are cardiologists; 13:40.370 --> 13:42.360 they're being done in a different kind of an office, 13:42.360 --> 13:45.490 much less invasive procedure, very different features 13:45.490 --> 13:48.380 associated with these two parts of the market. 13:48.379 --> 13:50.139 And my ability, given what I am, 13:50.143 --> 13:53.843 to compete in each of these two markets is going to vary much, 13:53.840 --> 13:58.090 so the technological trajectory is influenced by the economics 13:58.086 --> 14:00.936 and the competitive piece of the story. 14:00.940 --> 14:04.440 That you are not just imagining yourself, a bunch of scientists 14:04.442 --> 14:07.102 in a lab, just trying to make it better, better, 14:07.096 --> 14:08.166 better, better. 14:08.168 --> 14:11.388 You've got a set of managers on top who are saying, 14:11.389 --> 14:14.069 "You know what, we need to have an improvement 14:14.066 --> 14:16.276 on this dimension, because otherwise we're never 14:16.284 --> 14:18.104 going to be anyplace in this marketplace." 14:18.100 --> 14:20.600 A decision was made, and we're going to turn to 14:20.601 --> 14:22.941 figuring out why this decision was made, 14:22.940 --> 14:28.250 that it was going to be important to be in this part of 14:28.245 --> 14:34.135 the market and not just this part of the market to get myself 14:34.140 --> 14:38.760 some more functionality with multi vessels. 14:38.759 --> 14:42.179 Okay, so to think about why I needed to go that way I want to 14:42.177 --> 14:44.567 switch over a little bit to this piece-- 14:44.570 --> 14:48.820 we're going to come back to this part in a minute as well. 14:48.820 --> 14:53.370 I want to think a little bit about the buyer issues. 14:53.370 --> 14:58.280 The woman in the back said if I want to do something about 14:58.277 --> 15:02.497 knowing my technology, I've got to figure out what 15:02.495 --> 15:04.815 does the consumer want. 15:04.820 --> 15:07.610 Is that the relevant decision maker in this case? 15:07.610 --> 15:13.180 I'll put that here, I've got a patient, 15:13.177 --> 15:19.327 and I'll call that patient the consumer. 15:19.330 --> 15:22.740 When people go and they're trying to have some heart 15:22.740 --> 15:25.680 procedure do they just-- there's something the matter 15:25.684 --> 15:27.524 with your heart, they just come up to you and 15:27.518 --> 15:29.448 say to you, "How do you want me to do 15:29.451 --> 15:29.741 that? 15:29.740 --> 15:33.300 How do you think--what procedure do you think I should 15:33.303 --> 15:34.113 use?" 15:34.110 --> 15:36.380 So who else is a decision maker in this situation? 15:36.379 --> 15:37.109 Yeah. 15:37.110 --> 15:40.930 Student: The doctor is one of the major decision makers 15:40.928 --> 15:44.558 in this process because it's talking about the whole concept 15:44.562 --> 15:48.132 of having the doctor needing to be trained, and using their 15:48.134 --> 15:49.124 materials. 15:49.120 --> 15:50.530 Sharon Oster: In fact, 15:50.525 --> 15:52.995 there are actually three different doctors you might 15:53.000 --> 15:54.940 think play a role in this situation. 15:54.940 --> 15:56.620 The one you mentioned is a surgeon. 15:56.620 --> 15:59.260 Student: There's also the referring doctors. 15:59.259 --> 16:00.749 Sharon Oster: Good, so there's your 16:00.753 --> 16:02.143 basic GP or whatever it is you have, 16:02.139 --> 16:04.469 some guy you go, you put on--I've got a pain in 16:04.471 --> 16:07.201 my chest, he says, "You better do 16:07.202 --> 16:10.692 something about that," and then there is a 16:10.692 --> 16:14.592 interventional cardiologist, who does this piece of the 16:14.586 --> 16:15.146 business. 16:15.149 --> 16:18.999 You--some doctor says, "Go see somebody," 16:19.000 --> 16:23.480 and typically he actually says, "Go see this guy," 16:23.477 --> 16:27.657 and this guy figures out can he help you or can she help you, 16:27.658 --> 16:29.738 and if not they send you to a surgeon. 16:29.740 --> 16:34.780 You've got interveners or decision makers all along the 16:34.782 --> 16:36.372 doctor element. 16:36.370 --> 16:39.910 Is there anybody else you think that, if I'm the inventors of 16:39.908 --> 16:42.618 this little kit, is there anyone else I need to 16:42.624 --> 16:44.634 talk too, need to think about? 16:44.629 --> 16:44.769 Yeah. 16:44.767 --> 16:45.537 Student: Insurance. 16:45.538 --> 16:46.978 Sharon Oster: Okay, insurance companies. 16:46.980 --> 16:49.630 So it turns out, one of the curiosities about 16:49.634 --> 16:51.844 healthcare, and it's the one that's 16:51.837 --> 16:55.617 bedeviling the Obama team now in terms of figuring things out, 16:55.620 --> 16:59.860 is we have this breakage of the link between people who make 16:59.857 --> 17:03.807 decisions about things and the people who pay for it. 17:03.808 --> 17:07.248 In this situation, the patients have some stake in 17:07.247 --> 17:11.517 the procedure, the doctors have a lot to say, 17:11.518 --> 17:15.108 but the poor insurance companies, 17:15.108 --> 17:19.578 and/or the government are actually doing a lot of the 17:19.575 --> 17:20.945 paying for it. 17:20.950 --> 17:24.670 Needless to say in that kind of arrangement, eventually the 17:24.665 --> 17:28.505 insurance company starts having an opinion too and making its 17:28.509 --> 17:29.599 opinion felt. 17:29.598 --> 17:33.528 If you are in the business of medical devices or pharma, 17:33.529 --> 17:35.899 in any way at all, you're going to be thinking a 17:35.895 --> 17:38.565 little bit about how is the insurance company going to 17:38.565 --> 17:40.525 reimburse for this kind of a thing? 17:40.529 --> 17:43.089 Is there anybody else that has an opinion about this? 17:43.089 --> 17:44.219 Yeah. 17:44.220 --> 17:45.230 Student: Hospitals. 17:45.230 --> 17:45.880 Sharon Oster: Hospitals. 17:45.880 --> 17:47.540 Why do the hospitals care? 17:47.538 --> 17:51.058 Student: I mean, just from the insurance 17:51.057 --> 17:55.617 standpoint, and whether or not they want these technologies to 17:55.624 --> 17:57.874 be used at their hospital. 17:57.869 --> 17:59.899 Sharon Oster: So--good. 17:59.900 --> 18:03.770 So hospitals actually turn out to have an interesting set of 18:03.765 --> 18:06.185 issues about this particular thing. 18:06.190 --> 18:11.150 Hospitals, to the extent that they are reimbursed by 18:11.153 --> 18:14.753 insurance, and that's going to be true for 18:14.749 --> 18:17.979 most of the patients in this environment, 18:17.980 --> 18:22.880 are reimbursed on what's known as a capitated basis, 18:22.880 --> 18:25.670 which means an insurance company says to you, 18:25.670 --> 18:28.430 "If you're treating somebody who has a particular 18:28.432 --> 18:31.042 heart problem, I'm going to give you a fixed 18:31.041 --> 18:32.291 amount for it." 18:32.288 --> 18:35.218 That's quite a difference from the way we used to-- 18:35.220 --> 18:37.890 insurance used to pay, which was, "You treated 18:37.888 --> 18:39.718 somebody, let me see what your bills are, 18:39.717 --> 18:40.787 I'm going to pay you." 18:40.788 --> 18:44.938 In an attempt to get some kind of efficiency they actually went 18:44.943 --> 18:47.563 to a system, sometimes called DRGs, 18:47.556 --> 18:50.636 in which they said, "For an average, 18:50.644 --> 18:54.204 more or less healthy guy who has this problem, 18:54.200 --> 18:56.670 I'm going to pay you X to treat him." 18:56.670 --> 19:01.300 If I'm going to pay--if that's the way I have my hospital 19:01.304 --> 19:05.194 reimbursement happen, how does the hospital feel 19:05.193 --> 19:07.763 about my particular device? 19:07.759 --> 19:10.639 What do you think? 19:10.640 --> 19:12.900 Student: Not great, probably. 19:12.900 --> 19:15.250 Sharon Oster: Okay, so one thing it 19:15.250 --> 19:18.830 doesn't like is its just costing them money, so it's kind of just 19:18.834 --> 19:20.294 taking it off the top. 19:20.288 --> 19:25.438 Might there be anything about it they would like? 19:25.440 --> 19:26.640 Yeah, in the back. 19:26.640 --> 19:29.130 Student: The device improves patient recovery time 19:29.126 --> 19:31.176 and reduces mortality, because that's one of the 19:31.178 --> 19:32.878 things I wanted to try to quantify. 19:32.880 --> 19:34.730 Sharon Oster: Yeah, and there could be 19:34.727 --> 19:37.147 other people who care about the mortality in particular, 19:37.150 --> 19:40.800 but the first thing you said was about recovery time. 19:40.798 --> 19:42.988 Why might the hospital be especially interested in that? 19:42.990 --> 19:43.540 Yeah. 19:43.538 --> 19:48.638 Student: Well because I know for most of the time it-- 19:48.640 --> 19:50.900 the procedure is capitated for payment, 19:50.900 --> 19:53.280 and a lot of times recovery time is also going to fall under 19:53.282 --> 19:54.952 that payment, and the longer you recover 19:54.949 --> 19:56.909 you're not going to get any more money for that, 19:56.910 --> 19:58.950 so if you have quicker recoveries you're 19:58.953 --> 20:00.373 > 20:00.368 --> 20:02.058 Sharon Oster: So it's actually going to 20:02.059 --> 20:04.189 vary for different hospitals depending on the contract that 20:04.191 --> 20:05.111 they're going to get. 20:05.108 --> 20:08.608 So for some hospitals I just give you a fee, 20:08.608 --> 20:11.858 and that would mean if I get--if this procedure gets you 20:11.855 --> 20:14.095 out of your bed and to home faster, 20:14.098 --> 20:16.858 that's a benefit for the hospital because they basically 20:16.861 --> 20:18.821 only have to keep you in three days, 20:18.819 --> 20:21.159 not seven, I save some money. 20:21.160 --> 20:24.910 On the other hand, what does this device do to the 20:24.914 --> 20:29.134 amount of time I need to use as an operating surgeon? 20:29.130 --> 20:30.660 Student: > 20:30.660 --> 20:32.230 Sharon Oster: Probably increases it. 20:32.230 --> 20:35.420 And from the point of view of hospitals, most hospitals are 20:35.416 --> 20:38.436 more constrained in operating room time than they are in 20:38.440 --> 20:39.650 hospital bed time. 20:39.650 --> 20:42.780 Again, it's going to depend a little bit on the hospital how 20:42.784 --> 20:45.694 they feel about this, and a little bit on how much 20:45.686 --> 20:48.356 we've pushed down in terms of the insurance, 20:48.358 --> 20:51.148 but the hospital is definitely going to have some kind of say. 20:51.150 --> 20:56.180 Now notice something about these groups, 20:56.180 --> 21:00.580 they all have opinions, they all have a role to play in 21:00.577 --> 21:05.137 the kind of decision that's going to affect my ability to 21:05.140 --> 21:08.480 compete in these parts of the market. 21:08.480 --> 21:13.180 Do they all have the same kinds of preferences? 21:13.180 --> 21:14.640 Guy in the orange. 21:14.640 --> 21:18.500 Student: > 21:18.500 --> 21:20.530 Sharon Oster: Talk to me a little bit 21:20.531 --> 21:24.771 about how each of these players, or a couple of these players, 21:24.766 --> 21:29.546 might feel about the idea of introducing this kit that 21:29.548 --> 21:33.428 enables people to operate on your heart. 21:33.430 --> 21:35.690 Student: I mean it's going to have a different 21:35.688 --> 21:37.348 response from each one of the buyers. 21:37.348 --> 21:39.228 Potentially, doctors can make more money off 21:39.227 --> 21:41.437 of it, it's just if it's less 21:41.436 --> 21:44.656 technologically inclined for example, 21:44.660 --> 21:46.810 so I mean their previous systems could have made them a 21:46.805 --> 21:48.895 lot more money, whereas patients could actually 21:48.904 --> 21:51.054 benefit if this system actually lowered costs, 21:51.048 --> 21:53.918 so each one of the buyers is going to have different 21:53.916 --> 21:55.376 responses towards costs. 21:55.380 --> 21:56.730 Sharon Oster: Okay that's a little 21:56.727 --> 21:56.987 vague. 21:56.990 --> 21:58.390 Let's sharpen it up. 21:58.390 --> 22:03.470 You can sharpen it up for us. 22:03.470 --> 22:05.370 It's not wrong, it's just a little vague. 22:05.368 --> 22:08.558 Student: Okay so like sharpening things up. 22:08.558 --> 22:10.488 In terms of the patient and consumer, 22:10.490 --> 22:14.500 I think what he was trying to say, was that with these new 22:14.503 --> 22:18.593 technologies it'll require greater training that the doctor 22:18.587 --> 22:22.177 may or may not be able to afford or go through. 22:22.180 --> 22:25.930 But it might also benefit a patient because the technology 22:25.928 --> 22:29.148 would be less invasive, or something like that. 22:29.150 --> 22:32.580 But there's a higher risk involved because there weren't 22:32.578 --> 22:35.788 as many testing's that-- as were mentioned before, 22:35.790 --> 22:39.040 so that could offset the patient preference of going 22:39.038 --> 22:42.538 under the knife of something that isn't that tested. 22:42.539 --> 22:42.919 Sharon Oster: Good. 22:42.920 --> 22:44.500 Okay, so a couple of issues here. 22:44.500 --> 22:47.700 One is there's certainly a question about the doctor 22:47.696 --> 22:49.726 training, and one of the things that's 22:49.730 --> 22:52.200 going to keep me awake as an entrepreneur is thinking a 22:52.202 --> 22:54.082 little bit about the doctor training, 22:54.078 --> 22:56.338 which we are going to get to in a couple of minutes. 22:56.338 --> 23:00.188 Certainly the doctors are going to be right away at me and 23:00.192 --> 23:01.942 saying, "Okay, how am I going to 23:01.943 --> 23:03.393 get to learn that kind of thing?" 23:03.390 --> 23:06.430 You can already begin to see it's not going to be the kind of 23:06.432 --> 23:09.122 thing I'm going to have a course that I charge for. 23:09.118 --> 23:12.078 It is going to be--I'm going to have to figure out some way to 23:12.077 --> 23:15.087 incentivize these guys to come to my particular class and learn 23:15.085 --> 23:17.555 something about it, and we'll talk about what that 23:17.555 --> 23:17.725 is. 23:17.730 --> 23:21.430 The other thing I heard you say was something about risk. 23:21.430 --> 23:26.170 Let's think about the risk issues for the surgeon versus 23:26.174 --> 23:30.234 the patient and how they weight those things. 23:30.230 --> 23:35.310 Now in theory if we're doing surgery, what's the medical 23:35.310 --> 23:38.730 benefit of this particular product? 23:38.730 --> 23:43.110 The guy in the red in the back. 23:43.108 --> 23:45.378 Student: I think it reduces the mortality rate of 23:45.375 --> 23:45.815 patients. 23:45.818 --> 23:47.368 Sharon Oster: Okay so one thing it may 23:47.371 --> 23:49.431 do is reduce mortality rate, although it's a little bit 23:49.433 --> 23:52.023 tricky in the beginning, because we don't know how good 23:52.020 --> 23:53.560 the doctors are going to be. 23:53.558 --> 23:57.218 The initial real kind of consumer sale piece of this, 23:57.221 --> 24:00.391 was less on the mortality and more on what? 24:00.390 --> 24:01.400 Yeah. 24:01.400 --> 24:04.510 Student: The recovery rate is whatever they can get 24:04.513 --> 24:06.343 out of > 24:06.338 --> 24:08.348 Sharon Oster: Okay so some of it is I 24:08.354 --> 24:09.824 can reduce your recovery rate. 24:09.818 --> 24:13.158 If we think about that, does the doctor care a lot 24:13.159 --> 24:15.749 about how fast you get back to work? 24:15.750 --> 24:18.010 Student: No, that's the--well I mean--yes I 24:18.005 --> 24:19.715 guess that's when it's your patient. 24:19.720 --> 24:21.900 Sharon Oster: Okay, so one of the things 24:21.903 --> 24:24.283 we might think about, the recovery angle is that the 24:24.275 --> 24:26.595 patient is going to care more than the doctor. 24:26.598 --> 24:30.428 So that's going to be an element, recovery time, 24:30.426 --> 24:35.476 in which we've got an asymmetry in terms of how much the people 24:35.476 --> 24:37.346 value these things. 24:37.349 --> 24:39.119 What's another element? 24:39.119 --> 24:39.789 Yeah. 24:39.789 --> 24:41.809 Student: The trauma. 24:41.808 --> 24:42.658 Sharon Oster: The trauma. 24:42.660 --> 24:45.360 Student: The sudden neurological complications that 24:45.361 --> 24:46.481 develop after surgery. 24:46.480 --> 24:48.960 Sharon Oster: Yeah, so another thing 24:48.960 --> 24:52.360 about this surgery is you have to be on a heart-lung machine 24:52.363 --> 24:54.793 and that actually has neurological problems 24:54.785 --> 24:56.915 potentially associated with it. 24:56.920 --> 25:00.600 So we've got something that's actually potentially going to 25:00.595 --> 25:03.315 reduce some of our neurological problems. 25:03.318 --> 25:06.948 It turns out for various studies people have done who 25:06.949 --> 25:10.439 study doctors and medical care kinds of things, 25:10.440 --> 25:15.120 if you thought about the tradeoff to a patient and asked 25:15.117 --> 25:19.197 the question, "How much incremental risk 25:19.196 --> 25:24.626 of death would you be willing to face to avoid the kind of very 25:24.632 --> 25:27.352 serious neurological damage? 25:27.348 --> 25:31.028 The answer to that question is very different for patients then 25:31.030 --> 25:32.160 it is to doctors. 25:32.160 --> 25:37.110 From the doctors point of view the danger of having someone die 25:37.114 --> 25:41.674 on the table is enormous relative to any other problem. 25:41.670 --> 25:44.920 From the patients point of view there are times in which they 25:44.915 --> 25:49.005 are willing to tradeoff and say, "There are some conditions 25:49.007 --> 25:52.417 that I could have that, frankly, I would just as soon 25:52.415 --> 25:54.105 take a chance of dying." 25:54.108 --> 25:57.658 That's been actually a very complicated set of issues for 25:57.661 --> 26:00.891 doctor/patient relationships across a whole range of 26:00.894 --> 26:03.944 different operative and surgical procedures. 26:03.940 --> 26:07.630 It says to me in this situation, where we are talking 26:07.625 --> 26:10.455 about heart recovery kinds of issues, 26:10.460 --> 26:13.430 those tradeoffs are going to become potentially very large. 26:13.430 --> 26:17.780 When we have a risk of death that's going to be larger for 26:17.780 --> 26:22.230 the doctor, and the risk of damage is going 26:22.228 --> 26:28.548 to be conversely more important from the patient's point of 26:28.548 --> 26:29.418 view. 26:29.420 --> 26:34.540 Now let's think a little bit about these different players 26:34.544 --> 26:38.504 and look at these two parts of the market. 26:38.500 --> 26:41.770 Because we started this by saying that these guys did a 26:41.770 --> 26:45.350 whole bunch of technological things to try to move into this 26:45.345 --> 26:49.125 part of the market, as opposed to staying in this 26:49.133 --> 26:51.873 rather larger part of the market. 26:51.868 --> 26:55.718 As we think about these being the deciders among the things, 26:55.722 --> 26:59.252 why is it technologically imperative to get out of this 26:59.250 --> 27:01.340 market and into this market? 27:01.339 --> 27:02.169 Yeah. 27:02.170 --> 27:08.370 Student: Cardiologists would be the ones who refer you 27:08.366 --> 27:10.726 to surgery, and if they are the ones who 27:10.726 --> 27:12.816 perform the procedure, they then benefit being able to 27:12.816 --> 27:14.266 perform the procedure themselves, 27:14.269 --> 27:17.509 so they have a quasi-monopoly over the market in some sense. 27:17.509 --> 27:19.549 Sharon Oster: So some people call this 27:19.545 --> 27:21.215 the "gatekeeper problem." 27:21.220 --> 27:25.470 It turns out in this particular market I've got a gatekeeper 27:25.468 --> 27:27.978 problem, which is my big competition, 27:27.983 --> 27:31.133 are the ones that are going to basically handle this 27:31.125 --> 27:33.765 themselves, and their tendency to then say, 27:33.767 --> 27:36.077 "You know, you've got two vessels, 27:36.075 --> 27:39.095 I could deal with it, but I think you'd be better off 27:39.103 --> 27:42.273 going here now that we have a kit," is going to be much 27:42.269 --> 27:42.859 reduced. 27:42.858 --> 27:49.098 So I've got a problem that my competitor is a gatekeeper for 27:49.101 --> 27:49.631 me. 27:49.630 --> 27:54.600 There's another problem also in this--attacking this part of the 27:54.598 --> 27:55.308 market. 27:55.308 --> 28:00.138 Let's think about it from the point of view of the patient. 28:00.140 --> 28:05.730 How does the patient, who has just one or two vessels 28:05.728 --> 28:10.348 damaged, feel about these two procedures? 28:10.349 --> 28:13.419 Yeah. 28:13.420 --> 28:17.520 Student: Angioplasty is already quite non-intrusive, 28:17.517 --> 28:21.547 so there isn't a huge benefit gained by trying to--the new, 28:21.545 --> 28:23.415 rather untested method. 28:23.420 --> 28:25.910 Sharon Oster: If you think about what 28:25.906 --> 28:28.616 this is-- I actually did some work for 28:28.616 --> 28:33.086 Boston Scientific in this market as an economist and they-- 28:33.088 --> 28:36.488 even though I was only an economist they actually wanted 28:36.486 --> 28:39.636 me to watch one of these procedures for reasons that 28:39.635 --> 28:41.175 completely escape me. 28:41.180 --> 28:45.480 If you watch one of these things it's--the patient is 28:45.484 --> 28:47.394 awake the whole time. 28:47.390 --> 28:49.420 There is--basically what they do is, 28:49.420 --> 28:52.040 there's a little blockage in one of your arteries, 28:52.038 --> 28:55.018 they put a thing that looks sort of this, 28:55.019 --> 28:57.829 but a little smaller up your leg, they weave it up until it 28:57.830 --> 29:00.450 gets to the right part in which there's a blockage, 29:00.450 --> 29:02.910 they have a balloon at the end of it, 29:02.910 --> 29:05.000 they have a little machine that blows up the balloon, 29:05.000 --> 29:07.720 the balloon just presses against the wall of the artery, 29:07.720 --> 29:11.490 all the junk that was clogging it up goes whish and kind of 29:11.492 --> 29:15.572 floats away, we hope to wherever nirvana is, 29:15.574 --> 29:19.784 and then they take it out and off you go. 29:19.778 --> 29:23.648 It's very non-invasive, that's very appealing to the 29:23.653 --> 29:28.213 consumer, I've got a gatekeeper here who's a cardiologist. 29:28.210 --> 29:32.390 What would the insurance company rather have me do? 29:32.390 --> 29:34.540 Oh, this is way cheaper. 29:34.538 --> 29:38.268 These angioplasty things are way cheaper than anything in the 29:38.272 --> 29:39.022 CABG side. 29:39.019 --> 29:41.749 So anyone that's an insurer is going to be thinking, 29:41.750 --> 29:45.340 "You've only got one or two vessels, 29:45.338 --> 29:50.918 go this way rather than trying to do a less problematic version 29:50.920 --> 29:52.360 of this." 29:52.358 --> 29:57.948 From the point of view of solving the needs of these 29:57.954 --> 30:03.664 people, I can't stay in this part of the business. 30:03.660 --> 30:07.980 I don't have enough value add to offer in that part of the 30:07.984 --> 30:08.824 business. 30:08.818 --> 30:11.988 I have got to go to the only part of the business in which I 30:11.992 --> 30:14.632 have potential value add, which is this part of it, 30:14.625 --> 30:17.445 and for that it says to me, "Even though I'm going to 30:17.452 --> 30:20.042 give up something in functionality I'm going to need 30:20.044 --> 30:23.194 to give that up in order to make myself more attractive in that 30:23.193 --> 30:24.823 part of the business." 30:24.818 --> 30:28.568 Because from the point of view of everything--pretty much 30:28.570 --> 30:32.590 everything these guys care about, this thing is dominated. 30:32.588 --> 30:38.978 Now--we'll come to the little more on the competition in a 30:38.980 --> 30:39.990 minute. 30:39.990 --> 30:44.380 Let me backtrack slightly from that aggressive comment I just 30:44.384 --> 30:46.474 made, because there is one problem, 30:46.465 --> 30:48.475 for those of you that read carefully, 30:48.480 --> 30:53.200 there is one problem that the angioplasty has that would be 30:53.202 --> 30:58.012 improved by me actually trying to do this in a less invasive 30:58.008 --> 30:58.658 way. 30:58.660 --> 30:59.620 Yeah. 30:59.618 --> 31:02.848 Student: Well one of the problems is that the plaque 31:02.845 --> 31:06.175 often returns because the vessel is trying to heal itself, 31:06.180 --> 31:08.410 and it can be a bigger problem and you don't have to do the 31:08.413 --> 31:09.073 procedure then. 31:09.068 --> 31:10.098 Sharon Oster: Great. 31:10.097 --> 31:12.037 So an issue that we have from the point of view-- 31:12.038 --> 31:15.668 an issue that this competitor has is something medically, 31:15.670 --> 31:19.810 it's called restenosis, so that I could have this done, 31:19.808 --> 31:22.398 but I have to do it many times and then you could think, 31:22.400 --> 31:24.460 now what the patient is thinking is, 31:24.460 --> 31:27.630 "Do I want to have this with the kit done once, 31:27.630 --> 31:31.070 or do I want to have this done every other year, 31:31.068 --> 31:34.338 which sounds a little less appealing than it sounded a 31:34.338 --> 31:37.858 minute ago when I thought we could just do it once and for 31:37.855 --> 31:38.715 all." 31:38.720 --> 31:42.620 Initially you might think, "Well it looks like there 31:42.618 --> 31:46.518 is some advantage I could build on in my discussions with 31:46.519 --> 31:49.889 patients and doctors, and frankly even insurers and 31:49.893 --> 31:52.353 hospitals, that would make me an 31:52.351 --> 31:55.631 attractive alternative to this." 31:55.630 --> 31:59.550 But if I was thinking in a Schumpeterian way and going to 31:59.548 --> 32:04.268 build my business around that, what else would I want to be 32:04.268 --> 32:07.878 thinking about in terms of that strategy? 32:07.880 --> 32:10.860 So a strategy that says, "Okay, 32:10.858 --> 32:15.098 I'm looking at what these guys are like now and I'm thinking 32:15.099 --> 32:17.759 about how I look relative to them, 32:17.759 --> 32:20.589 and there is something they don't do very well, 32:20.588 --> 32:24.158 and I'm going to just kind of hammer in on what they don't do 32:24.164 --> 32:24.944 well." 32:24.940 --> 32:28.210 What's the potential worry that I might have about that? 32:28.210 --> 32:32.080 Yeah. 32:32.078 --> 32:33.288 Student: Well, I think it's just the 32:33.288 --> 32:34.468 gatekeeper problem that you were saying. 32:34.470 --> 32:38.520 All the people that do that not that well are the people that 32:38.521 --> 32:42.311 are going to recommend your patients to the surgeons that 32:42.305 --> 32:45.475 you are ultimately selling your product to. 32:45.480 --> 32:46.420 So it's really not going to work out very well. 32:46.420 --> 32:48.150 Sharon Oster: Okay good, 32:48.153 --> 32:49.163 so keep the mic. 32:49.160 --> 32:53.470 So that tells me if I were going to go that way, 32:53.472 --> 32:56.412 what would I need to be doing? 32:56.410 --> 33:00.940 Student: You have to expand so that interventionist 33:00.940 --> 33:03.830 cardiologists can use the product, 33:03.828 --> 33:06.718 or eliminate the gatekeeper problem in some way, 33:06.720 --> 33:07.170 I guess. 33:07.170 --> 33:08.680 Sharon Oster: Okay, so I've got to 33:08.678 --> 33:10.148 figure out a way to get over the gate. 33:10.150 --> 33:15.080 What's a way to get over the gate? 33:15.079 --> 33:16.919 Student: I have no idea. 33:16.920 --> 33:19.780 Student: Talking to patients so that--you can target 33:19.781 --> 33:22.111 the patients so that demand it from their doctor, 33:22.111 --> 33:23.471 from their cardiologist. 33:23.470 --> 33:24.190 Sharon Oster: Good. 33:24.192 --> 33:25.922 So we could think a little bit about what's been happening-- 33:25.920 --> 33:27.790 those of you that watch television, 33:27.788 --> 33:31.488 probably none of you anymore--one of the things we've 33:31.490 --> 33:35.830 seen in the healthcare area is much more direct advertising to 33:35.834 --> 33:36.764 patients. 33:36.759 --> 33:39.299 Even for things that you would think your doctor-- 33:39.298 --> 33:42.308 these are things your doctor is going to prescribe for you or 33:42.306 --> 33:44.156 make you do in one way or another, 33:44.160 --> 33:48.530 there is an attempt in a lot of areas to avoid the gatekeeper by 33:48.529 --> 33:50.679 going direct to the patients. 33:50.680 --> 33:55.070 How easy is that to do in this market as opposed to a market 33:55.071 --> 33:56.711 like allergy relief? 33:56.710 --> 34:00.460 Okay, if there's--there are markets now for Claritin or one 34:00.459 --> 34:02.979 of these drugs that is prescription, 34:02.980 --> 34:05.490 so the only way you can get it is to go to your doctor, 34:05.490 --> 34:08.670 but the line is, "Go to your doctor and ask 34:08.670 --> 34:11.650 them to prescribe this drug for you." 34:11.650 --> 34:14.300 Is it going to be easy for me to have on television something 34:14.304 --> 34:16.334 that says, "Go to your doctor and 34:16.327 --> 34:18.577 tell them you don't want an angioplasty, 34:18.579 --> 34:23.359 you want your CABG done with the beating heart kit?" 34:23.360 --> 34:24.470 So why are you all laughing? 34:24.469 --> 34:27.469 What's ridiculous about this? 34:27.469 --> 34:29.119 Student: It's information asymmetry. 34:29.119 --> 34:30.569 Sharon Oster: Okay, so (a) it's 34:30.568 --> 34:32.628 complicated, information asymmetry is exactly right. 34:32.630 --> 34:34.700 You could think, "Okay, I could go to my 34:34.699 --> 34:36.959 doctor with that, but what the hell do I know? 34:36.960 --> 34:39.200 I mean, really, I'm not going to trust my own 34:39.199 --> 34:41.849 view of this even if the television told me so," 34:41.846 --> 34:44.636 but there's actually another just sort of business issue 34:44.644 --> 34:46.654 which is, there, in some sense, 34:46.646 --> 34:49.806 aren't enough people watching TV for whom that message is 34:49.811 --> 34:50.491 relevant. 34:50.489 --> 34:54.509 Even if I could really focus in on TV and do it I'm going to 34:54.510 --> 34:56.760 be--it's going to be a problem. 34:56.760 --> 35:00.630 There are some possibilities maybe on the way. 35:00.630 --> 35:04.440 You could imagine a set of web advertisements that when you're 35:04.443 --> 35:08.013 clicking on something that says what do I do about a heart 35:08.009 --> 35:08.759 problem? 35:08.760 --> 35:11.680 It clicks up to me, "Talk to your doctor about 35:11.675 --> 35:13.655 the beating Heartport kit." 35:13.659 --> 35:17.159 So there are some technological things directed at marketing 35:17.155 --> 35:20.525 that actually allow us in various markets to get away from 35:20.532 --> 35:22.312 gatekeepers and go direct. 35:22.309 --> 35:26.359 There's actually another problem with building a lot on 35:26.360 --> 35:27.560 this strategy. 35:27.559 --> 35:31.939 As I think about building a strategy to attack an existing 35:31.940 --> 35:34.860 player, any of you have game theory? 35:34.860 --> 35:38.110 Any of you ever take game theory? 35:38.110 --> 35:41.750 Did--any of you economics majors? 35:41.750 --> 35:44.520 Okay, good I'm picking on you because you should know this as 35:44.521 --> 35:45.261 an econ major. 35:45.260 --> 35:49.880 If you're thinking about positioning yourself against an 35:49.878 --> 35:53.188 existing competitor, I'm looking at what this guy is 35:53.186 --> 35:55.966 doing now, what else should I be looking 35:55.969 --> 35:56.279 at? 35:56.280 --> 35:58.840 Student: How he's going to react to my reaction. 35:58.840 --> 35:59.620 Sharon Oster: Exactly. 35:59.619 --> 36:02.849 I need to be thinking this guy--what is he going to be 36:02.847 --> 36:06.257 doing, sitting around, kind of reaping in the profits? 36:06.260 --> 36:11.030 He's going to be thinking about here you came with this new 36:11.032 --> 36:16.052 business, and you're attacking me--by virtue of my restenosis, 36:16.050 --> 36:18.190 what am I going to do? 36:18.190 --> 36:21.820 Now I want to think a little bit about, if I'm the designer 36:21.815 --> 36:24.435 of this thing, is who are these players? 36:24.440 --> 36:28.320 Anyone have any sense of who the guys are doing the 36:28.317 --> 36:31.727 angioplasty business, producing these balloon 36:31.728 --> 36:33.588 catheters and so on? 36:33.590 --> 36:36.280 Well they're big companies, companies like some of you may 36:36.284 --> 36:39.104 want to work for some day; Boston Scientific, 36:39.097 --> 36:41.907 Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson. 36:41.909 --> 36:44.749 What's true about these big companies? 36:44.750 --> 36:48.890 They spend a lot of money on R&D because they make a lot 36:48.887 --> 36:49.657 of money. 36:49.659 --> 36:52.979 They have broad product lines, they have big cash flows, 36:52.978 --> 36:55.028 and they spend a lot on R&D. 36:55.030 --> 36:58.080 You, some little pip squeak making Heartport, 36:58.079 --> 37:03.099 are going to rack your whole business on the idea that you 37:03.097 --> 37:05.507 don't-- you can attack these guys by 37:05.507 --> 37:08.377 saying they're going to have-- you're going back to the 37:08.382 --> 37:10.382 hospital a lot, you can be sure they know 37:10.375 --> 37:13.065 that's an issue for their company and they're throwing a 37:13.070 --> 37:14.150 lot of money at it. 37:14.150 --> 37:17.400 In fact, what we see in this business is actually we get, 37:17.400 --> 37:20.900 very shortly after this position, a new drug eluding 37:20.902 --> 37:23.722 stint that allows for less restenosis, 37:23.719 --> 37:27.199 that they have spent many, many, many millions of dollars 37:27.199 --> 37:27.509 on. 37:27.510 --> 37:31.980 I think it is very dangerous to stick with the two vessel thing 37:31.983 --> 37:35.883 because you know these guys (a) in the first place, 37:35.880 --> 37:38.460 you don't have the value proposition for consumers, 37:38.460 --> 37:41.780 and (b) you've got very strong competitors who have a lot of 37:41.779 --> 37:44.929 money to throw at a particular problem that they have. 37:44.929 --> 37:47.619 Just a couple more things we want to think about. 37:47.619 --> 37:51.319 The training issues; if I'm actually going to make 37:51.315 --> 37:55.485 this work in this business I have got what economists would 37:55.487 --> 37:58.077 call a complement-- with an "e", 37:58.079 --> 38:01.519 not an "i." 38:01.518 --> 38:05.738 I've got to somehow--this kit doesn't do it itself, 38:05.742 --> 38:09.122 this kit is used by doctors, surgeons; 38:09.119 --> 38:11.809 so I've got to figure out a way to train those guys. 38:11.809 --> 38:15.839 In the case they talk about some of the ways they try to 38:15.838 --> 38:17.228 train these guys. 38:17.230 --> 38:19.920 One is they offer them trips to Hawaii. 38:19.920 --> 38:24.330 What's the problem with the trips to Hawaii to learn? 38:24.329 --> 38:27.449 Student: A lot of the doctors are coming there just to 38:27.452 --> 38:30.322 look at the actual product not to learn how to use it. 38:30.320 --> 38:32.660 It's like they've heard about it, they're interested just to 38:32.664 --> 38:34.664 learn more about it, not actually apply it, 38:34.655 --> 38:37.635 and it turned out that I think actually only two people stayed 38:37.641 --> 38:40.581 for the surgery on the pig to see what actually happened. 38:40.579 --> 38:42.139 Sharon Oster: Good, and since you're an 38:42.139 --> 38:43.969 econ major we'll test you a little more on the econ. 38:43.969 --> 38:47.509 There's a problem in economics known as the selection problem, 38:47.510 --> 38:50.470 so how does the selection problem play into this? 38:50.469 --> 38:53.109 What kind of doctors go to Hawaii? 38:53.110 --> 38:55.440 Student: What kind of doctors go to Hawaii? 38:55.440 --> 38:56.960 Doctors that like beaches. 38:56.960 --> 38:59.570 Sharon Oster: Okay, they like beaches, 38:59.572 --> 39:02.882 and when they go to Hawaii I'm paying for their transport, 39:02.880 --> 39:04.680 but what am I not covering? 39:04.679 --> 39:06.289 What's the magic word--there are only three magic-- 39:06.289 --> 39:07.179 Student: Opportunity costs. 39:07.179 --> 39:08.379 Sharon Oster: Oh, thank you, 39:08.384 --> 39:09.214 that's the magic word. 39:09.210 --> 39:11.980 Student: So I guess it would, if we follow that logic, 39:11.978 --> 39:14.788 it's doctors that go to Hawaii instead of being paid heftily by 39:14.793 --> 39:15.433 hospitals. 39:15.429 --> 39:16.429 Sharon Oster: You bet, 39:16.429 --> 39:18.739 so a strategy that says, "Come to Hawaii," 39:18.737 --> 39:21.897 attracts a bunch of doctors who aren't doing many surgeries, 39:21.900 --> 39:24.230 because they've got plenty of time to come to Hawaii. 39:24.230 --> 39:27.010 The people that I want to attract are the people that are 39:27.005 --> 39:29.775 doing a lot of surgeries because they are an annuity, 39:29.780 --> 39:32.060 a word for those of you that are interested in finance. 39:32.059 --> 39:34.149 Once I teach them, every year they do more 39:34.146 --> 39:37.046 surgeries, every year I don't have to keep reteaching them 39:37.048 --> 39:38.728 every year they do something. 39:38.730 --> 39:40.970 Moreover, I want the guys who are in teaching hospitals like 39:40.974 --> 39:43.414 Yale because they're going to teach all the guys behind them, 39:43.409 --> 39:45.949 and I want them to be big users, and that's why most of 39:45.952 --> 39:48.782 the training for these kind of things actually happens in the 39:48.777 --> 39:49.387 hospital. 39:49.389 --> 39:51.609 It doesn't happen in Hawaii. 39:51.610 --> 39:53.690 Hawaii sounds great to somebody who doesn't know anything about 39:53.693 --> 39:54.033 doctors. 39:54.030 --> 39:56.660 What you want to do is you want to go where they are, 39:56.657 --> 39:59.437 train them where they are, where there's low opportunity 39:59.436 --> 40:01.606 cost of learning as a way to capturing. 40:01.610 --> 40:07.020 Still it's going to be a tricky piece to try to do it. 40:07.018 --> 40:12.688 We have a situation in which it looks like a good idea; 40:12.690 --> 40:17.400 we've got big hurdles to go over in terms of actually having 40:17.396 --> 40:19.946 a value add that's meaningful. 40:19.949 --> 40:23.619 Suppose I could, suppose I did have something 40:23.621 --> 40:28.151 that I convinced-- I got enough dotors to know how 40:28.146 --> 40:30.466 to do it, I got enough stories to 40:30.469 --> 40:33.319 consumers and others that I got around intervention 40:33.315 --> 40:35.575 cardiologists-- there's a lot of ifs about 40:35.581 --> 40:38.161 this--and I'm getting some penetration of this thing. 40:38.159 --> 40:42.689 Now what am I worried about? 40:42.690 --> 40:43.520 Yeah. 40:43.518 --> 40:44.838 Student: Is insurance going to cover it. 40:44.840 --> 40:46.040 Sharon Oster: Okay I could worry 40:46.039 --> 40:47.269 about--is insurance going to cover it? 40:47.268 --> 40:50.118 But suppose I got that, I've managed to convince those 40:50.115 --> 40:53.445 insurance companies that this is going to get people out of the 40:53.445 --> 40:56.475 hospital faster; this is going to be a good deal. 40:56.480 --> 40:59.140 Here I am just starting to make money. 40:59.139 --> 41:03.879 What do we know when you're just starting to make money? 41:03.880 --> 41:05.590 What happens to you? 41:05.590 --> 41:09.380 What kind of a science is economics? 41:09.380 --> 41:13.510 The dismal science; why is it the dismal science? 41:13.510 --> 41:16.750 Because the minute you start making money what happens? 41:16.750 --> 41:17.400 Student: People enter the market. 41:17.400 --> 41:18.700 Sharon Oster: People enter the market. 41:18.699 --> 41:21.639 That's the glory of why prices come down. 41:21.639 --> 41:26.029 In this situation what kind of a product do we have? 41:26.030 --> 41:30.510 We have a little platform for a beating heart. 41:30.510 --> 41:35.320 When we convince the doctors to adapt it, 41:35.320 --> 41:38.900 we want it to have something that was going to look pretty 41:38.898 --> 41:40.788 generic, because I wanted to give 41:40.789 --> 41:43.199 doctors some sense of, "You can learn how to make 41:43.197 --> 41:45.267 this, and I'm not going to hold you 41:45.268 --> 41:46.568 up eventually." 41:46.570 --> 41:51.190 The easier it is to copy, however, the more problem I 41:51.186 --> 41:53.136 have from new entry. 41:53.139 --> 41:57.789 Even if I can crack this problem by attracting the right 41:57.793 --> 42:00.123 buyers, solving the complimentary 42:00.119 --> 42:03.379 problem, changing myself technologically to hit the only 42:03.376 --> 42:06.866 part of the market in which I have a chance to compete, 42:06.869 --> 42:10.189 I'm going to have a problem that I'm going to have the risk 42:10.193 --> 42:11.573 of new guys coming in. 42:11.570 --> 42:16.580 The more attractive I make this from a generic point of view in 42:16.583 --> 42:20.883 the beginning of my market, the more problem I'm going to 42:20.882 --> 42:24.052 have protecting it in a later part of my market. 42:24.050 --> 42:27.710 That, in some sense, is really the Schumpeterian 42:27.713 --> 42:32.473 story that says to me the nature of an innovation is coming in 42:32.471 --> 42:36.921 against existing players with something you hope will be a 42:36.916 --> 42:38.316 better idea. 42:38.320 --> 42:42.230 Then worrying in the end about other people who are going to 42:42.233 --> 42:44.963 imitate you, until finally there are enough 42:44.963 --> 42:48.553 of them until another newcomer comes in with another disruptive 42:48.545 --> 42:51.835 innovation that looks better than what you had before. 42:51.840 --> 43:00.890 I have to actually go teach my MBAs and so your last five 43:00.889 --> 43:08.809 minutes Mr. Rae is going to complete for you. 43:08.809 --> 43:16.289 Prof: As you can see she's done that before. 43:16.289 --> 43:25.019 Now the question the syllabus poses for you is concerned with 43:25.016 --> 43:31.716 social learning, with whether the market and 43:31.722 --> 43:39.752 companies like this one are instruments by which society 43:39.751 --> 43:46.031 learns through both success and failure. 43:46.030 --> 43:51.160 Does anybody see a learning component to this? 43:51.159 --> 43:54.159 Let's get a mic for somebody. 43:54.159 --> 43:59.379 Let's go to purple shirt right here. 43:59.380 --> 44:02.210 What's the learning process here? 44:02.210 --> 44:04.470 Student: Do you mean the learning process for the 44:04.467 --> 44:05.837 players in this particular case? 44:05.840 --> 44:09.650 Prof: Well I mean something more abstract and 44:09.648 --> 44:10.318 bigger. 44:10.320 --> 44:15.880 Is society smarter in any important way toward the end of 44:15.880 --> 44:20.050 this story than it was at the beginning? 44:20.050 --> 44:22.590 Student: I suppose it--I suppose it depends on 44:22.585 --> 44:24.925 whether the new product ends up being adapted, 44:24.929 --> 44:28.149 because if it--I mean if it ends up being sort of accepted, 44:28.150 --> 44:30.630 because then in which case we've had a technological 44:30.630 --> 44:32.870 innovation that will maybe save some lives, 44:32.869 --> 44:36.039 reduce some recovery time, but if the product never enters 44:36.041 --> 44:39.501 the market-- I mean, I guess if there's this 44:39.500 --> 44:42.460 pressure to innovate, even if it doesn't enter the 44:42.458 --> 44:44.328 market, maybe the angioplasty guys will 44:44.327 --> 44:47.287 be out there trying to compete even though it's not really a 44:47.293 --> 44:48.303 major competitor. 44:48.300 --> 44:51.750 Prof: Okay so in actual fact there's a learning story 44:51.753 --> 44:55.153 with a yes answer and a learning story with a no answer. 44:55.150 --> 44:59.130 The learning story with the yes answer is very obvious. 44:59.130 --> 45:03.710 The learning answer with the failure story is partly that we 45:03.713 --> 45:07.603 know one bad idea so we don't have to repeat it. 45:07.599 --> 45:10.669 In addition, it's part of a larger 45:10.666 --> 45:16.056 incentivation process which compels everyone to be thinking 45:16.059 --> 45:22.009 about the next step beyond what they already know how to do. 45:22.010 --> 45:28.050 In the case for Monday, which is its URL is posted on 45:28.045 --> 45:32.195 class as V2; we have the Polaroid Land 45:32.204 --> 45:35.454 camera, invented by Edwin Land. 45:35.449 --> 45:45.399 It is a less bloody story that is a little like the one we just 45:45.396 --> 45:46.356 did. 45:46.360 --> 45:52.290 The difference is that it is closer to the mass consumer and 45:52.289 --> 45:57.819 is in that way a more typical Schumpeter story about how 45:57.815 --> 46:03.945 innovation in consumer products disturbs an old equilibrium in 46:03.945 --> 46:09.875 conventional photography and then becomes a defender against 46:09.875 --> 46:17.005 a new disruptive technology with the emergence of digitization. 46:17.010 --> 46:18.190 We'll see you on Monday. 46:18.190 --> 46:23.000