WEBVTT 00:01.550 --> 00:04.220 Prof: We're going to look at XXVII, 00:04.217 --> 00:07.077 XXVIII and XXIX today of Paradise, 00:07.080 --> 00:12.590 three cantos that, really, I think, 00:12.590 --> 00:18.700 Dante constructs together and where Dante puts forth this 00:18.696 --> 00:25.236 theory of creation and cosmology which are not quite the same 00:25.239 --> 00:26.329 thing. 00:26.330 --> 00:30.460 A theory of Beatrice that's explaining the shape of the 00:30.456 --> 00:34.426 cosmos, it's very difficult in these three cantos. 00:34.430 --> 00:41.000 It's done in such a way that they are two different things, 00:41.000 --> 00:43.460 it would seem, creation and a physical 00:43.458 --> 00:47.508 description of the cosmos which we call cosmology and they are 00:47.512 --> 00:51.502 because Dante's dealing with two forms of the universe, 00:51.500 --> 00:54.180 a spiritual one and a physical one. 00:54.180 --> 00:58.600 Now we're going to show all of this as we go over the three 00:58.603 --> 00:59.293 cantos. 00:59.290 --> 01:04.630 I would like to argue that in effect they are not quite the 01:04.626 --> 01:08.856 same thing but not really all that distinct. 01:08.860 --> 01:14.350 There is a very tedious line separating the two of them. 01:14.349 --> 01:17.639 Where are we first of all in space? 01:17.640 --> 01:20.840 We are somewhere in space, Dante has gone past now, 01:20.840 --> 01:28.170 the heaven of the fixed stars, with the examination of the 01:28.170 --> 01:31.520 three words, the three terms, 01:31.519 --> 01:36.489 the foundations of things that we experience as trust, 01:36.489 --> 01:39.539 or we experience as existential hope, 01:39.540 --> 01:44.550 or a love that if you combine it is always-- 01:44.550 --> 01:48.620 implies always--not in Canto XXVI but in possibilities of 01:48.617 --> 01:51.057 betrayal, uncertainty, 01:51.056 --> 01:58.496 so it combines both faith and hope in a very problematical 01:58.495 --> 01:59.405 way. 01:59.410 --> 02:07.620 Canto XXVII Dante continues with--in the afterglow of the 02:07.620 --> 02:12.010 fixed stars, and the canto just to give you 02:12.008 --> 02:15.508 an idea about what formally is happening here, 02:15.508 --> 02:20.978 the first part of the canto really looks back formerly at 02:20.982 --> 02:24.112 Canto XXVII of Inferno. 02:24.110 --> 02:27.750 There is clearly a parallel between the two cantos. 02:27.750 --> 02:31.880 Here Dante--you remember what he does, he meets St. 02:31.876 --> 02:36.656 Peter actually who has been examining him but now after the 02:36.663 --> 02:41.123 examination of the three theological virtues he goes on 02:41.121 --> 02:46.791 in a prophetic denunciation, he denounces the collusion 02:46.789 --> 02:51.049 between his place, he says "my place," 02:51.045 --> 02:53.825 it's the papacy, the place instituted 02:53.830 --> 02:56.480 by--because of him he's the Peter, 02:56.479 --> 02:59.219 he's the stone, and his successors. 02:59.220 --> 03:03.020 That's the way it says, so the canto literally looks 03:03.020 --> 03:07.030 backwards and a parallel with-- you may have a number of 03:07.026 --> 03:10.506 parallels with Inferno XIX where Dante meets, 03:10.508 --> 03:15.008 you remember, the popes who are turned upside 03:15.008 --> 03:19.668 down and the flames-- the kind of--the parody of the 03:19.671 --> 03:23.681 Pentecostal fires out on the plants of their feet, 03:23.680 --> 03:26.700 but this is more clearly a reference to Canto XXVII of 03:26.703 --> 03:30.303 Inferno, where this is the very 03:30.298 --> 03:34.558 beginning, this is-- there is a hymn Canto XXVII, 03:34.557 --> 03:39.507 "Glory be to the Father, the Son, etc.," 03:39.514 --> 03:48.384 and then lines 40 and following we have this great attack, 03:48.378 --> 03:50.168 "It was not our meaning," 03:50.169 --> 03:52.329 line 45, "that on the right hand of 03:52.327 --> 03:55.377 our successors should sit one part of Christ's people and the 03:55.381 --> 03:58.291 other on the left; nor that the keys which were 03:58.285 --> 04:02.015 committed to me should become the device on a standard for 04:02.020 --> 04:06.170 warfare on the baptized; nor that I should be the figure 04:06.167 --> 04:10.307 on a seal for sold and lying favours, for which I often 04:10.308 --> 04:13.068 redden and flash with fire." 04:13.068 --> 04:15.568 This is the fire of prophecy without a doubt, 04:15.568 --> 04:19.018 but it's also, retrospectively, 04:19.023 --> 04:24.323 a reference to the attack against Boniface, 04:24.319 --> 04:26.409 who in Canto XXVII of Inferno, 04:26.410 --> 04:33.570 is shown as he is in colluding with the Guido da Montefeltro. 04:33.569 --> 04:36.249 You remember, so there is a clear--it's a 04:36.254 --> 04:38.944 clear symmetry between the two cantos. 04:38.940 --> 04:45.640 I will hasten to add that Canto XXVII is also-- 04:45.639 --> 04:49.639 has a kind of chiastic structure because at one point, 04:49.639 --> 04:52.519 just to give you this is a formal description of what's 04:52.519 --> 04:55.759 happening here, a little later after this 04:55.757 --> 04:57.577 outburst by Peter, 04:57.579 --> 05:00.619 05:00.620 --> 05:06.800 Beatrice and the pilgrim move onto the next heaven, 05:06.800 --> 05:11.250 which is around line 75 and following. 05:11.250 --> 05:14.910 The next heaven is the so-called crystalline heaven 05:14.913 --> 05:16.823 which is still material. 05:16.819 --> 05:20.509 He's at the boundary of the material universe. 05:20.509 --> 05:24.659 It's still material but it's very, exactly crystal-like; 05:24.660 --> 05:29.640 it's a very thin materiality, almost but not quite spiritual. 05:29.639 --> 05:34.059 It's also called the primum mobile because it's here; 05:34.060 --> 05:35.950 this is the technical term that they give. 05:35.949 --> 05:40.629 It's here, in this heaven, that we have problems of 05:40.627 --> 05:45.397 origins, the origin of time, the origin of space. 05:45.399 --> 05:49.119 Dante goes on giving this--Beatrice goes on giving 05:49.115 --> 05:54.115 this cosmological description of the universe in material terms. 05:54.120 --> 05:57.470 Here, to continue with the formal, 05:57.470 --> 06:03.110 the issue of form now, at one point Beatrice says, 06:03.110 --> 06:07.220 "wait look behind you so that you can have an idea, 06:07.220 --> 06:11.450 you can measure the enormous distance you have traveled from 06:11.449 --> 06:12.739 the Earth." 06:12.740 --> 06:15.830 He's at the boundary of the material cosmos. 06:15.829 --> 06:17.839 You might say, well he's at the edge of the 06:17.839 --> 06:19.419 cosmos; he's going to fall off. 06:19.420 --> 06:22.870 That was always one of the objections about the idea of the 06:22.872 --> 06:24.482 finiteness of the cosmos. 06:24.480 --> 06:26.960 Believe it or not in the seventeenth century they would 06:26.963 --> 06:29.633 never really fall off because the universe is a sphere, 06:29.629 --> 06:33.409 so the only place he has to go to is back, 06:33.410 --> 06:37.190 there's no literally edge, every point is the edge and 06:37.192 --> 06:40.692 every point is in a continuous spherical curve. 06:40.690 --> 06:44.180 Anyway, from the point of view, he's arriving there so she 06:44.180 --> 06:46.790 says, look back and what does he see, 06:46.793 --> 06:49.753 and this is the line, "From the time when I 06:49.752 --> 06:52.952 had," this is XXVII, line 75, "From the time 06:52.952 --> 06:56.602 when I had looked before I saw that I had moved through the 06:56.603 --> 06:59.313 whole arc," that's the language of this 06:59.310 --> 07:01.280 sphere, an arc, circle, 07:01.279 --> 07:04.809 an arc just gives you an idea of sphericity, 07:04.810 --> 07:07.870 "from the middle to the end of the first clime, 07:07.870 --> 07:11.640 so that I saw on the one hand, beyond Cadiz, 07:11.639 --> 07:14.369 the mad track of Ulysses." 07:14.370 --> 07:20.020 He pinpoints that little place where Ulysses trespassed the 07:20.019 --> 07:25.009 boundaries of the world-- of the Euclidian space he 07:25.007 --> 07:29.627 had--for which he has been damned in Canto XXVI of 07:29.630 --> 07:31.330 Inferno. 07:31.329 --> 07:35.519 This is what we call a chiasmus, in other words XXVI 07:35.524 --> 07:40.544 and XXVII--we do see that XXVI that are an allusion to Ulysses 07:40.540 --> 07:41.610 and Adam. 07:41.610 --> 07:47.270 We talked about these figures and here in XXVII of 07:47.274 --> 07:51.874 Hell, there is Boniface and then in 07:51.865 --> 07:55.605 Paradise XXVII there is this, 07:55.610 --> 08:01.350 and there is also a kind of--this is Ulysses so there's a 08:01.348 --> 08:06.708 sort of chiastic structure; XXVII of Paradise refers 08:06.711 --> 08:11.191 to really VI of Paradise and refers also to XXVII of 08:11.187 --> 08:14.657 Inferno and XXVI of Inferno. 08:14.660 --> 08:18.560 The question is, why does Dante pinpoint once 08:18.560 --> 08:19.980 again Ulysses? 08:19.980 --> 08:25.060 He sees at the west the point which Ulysses had trespassed and 08:25.055 --> 08:29.045 he calls it the mad track, "the mad track of 08:29.050 --> 08:30.550 Ulysses." 08:30.550 --> 08:35.100 Clearly, Ulysses is still part of this fascination that--it 08:35.097 --> 08:39.957 exerts an incredible fascination on the imagination of the poet 08:39.961 --> 08:41.531 and the pilgrim. 08:41.529 --> 08:46.859 Am I like Ulysses or am I going to be lost now like Ulysses, 08:46.860 --> 08:51.200 but at the same time, it's a way of hinting at how 08:51.200 --> 08:54.920 much he has exceeded Ulysses' adventure. 08:54.918 --> 08:58.568 Ulysses only went past the Pillars of Hercules; 08:58.570 --> 09:03.650 he, Dante, is now at the outer most boundary of the visible 09:03.649 --> 09:07.459 physical universe, so there's a way in which there 09:07.460 --> 09:11.400 is a little bit of detachment and yet a constant fascination. 09:11.399 --> 09:14.849 We tried to explain why he is so fascinated with Ulysses. 09:14.850 --> 09:19.010 At the other end he also sees, "and on the other nearly 09:19.013 --> 09:23.183 to the shore where Europa made herself a sweet burden," 09:23.177 --> 09:27.127 this is really the eastern part of the known world, 09:27.129 --> 09:32.689 Europe, the rape of Europe by Jupiter so that we really have 09:32.690 --> 09:38.440 an erotic transgression and an intellectual transgression, 09:38.440 --> 09:42.540 as if the two are now once again are involved in this-- 09:42.538 --> 09:46.568 in Dante's vision as if he's now coming to the point where 09:46.567 --> 09:49.887 knowledge and desire really have to coincide. 09:49.889 --> 09:54.549 He's coming to the point where the beautiful and the good are 09:54.546 --> 09:57.736 one, at the point where all of the 09:57.743 --> 10:03.423 great countries and distinctions that we have been pursuing all 10:03.417 --> 10:07.167 along nearly have to go on converging. 10:07.169 --> 10:09.699 Let me continue with this idea. 10:09.700 --> 10:15.030 This is--before I go on with what happens in the canto. 10:15.028 --> 10:19.688 Dante then moves into the primum mobile, 10:19.687 --> 10:24.547 which is the place where I continue with this. 10:24.548 --> 10:30.168 He goes on line 100, they go into "the swiftest 10:30.173 --> 10:34.703 part of heaven," that's the primum 10:34.695 --> 10:36.345 mobile. 10:36.350 --> 10:37.860 All motion begins from here. 10:37.860 --> 10:42.390 Dante is moving from what would seem to be an ethical--the 10:42.388 --> 10:44.848 ethical scene, the denunciation, 10:44.851 --> 10:49.381 Peter's denunciation of the abuses within the Church. 10:49.379 --> 10:53.919 That's done in a prophetic tone but also from a tone of ethical, 10:53.921 --> 10:55.581 the ethical language. 10:55.580 --> 11:00.710 He goes into the so-called primum mobile which 11:00.706 --> 11:04.646 actually is the heaven of metaphysics. 11:04.649 --> 11:06.379 I have been telling you about the grammar, 11:06.379 --> 11:09.969 rhetoric, music, geometry, this is what we call 11:09.965 --> 11:13.935 the heaven of metaphysics and you know what that is, 11:13.940 --> 11:14.720 right? 11:14.720 --> 11:18.330 You understand what metaphysics means? 11:18.330 --> 11:22.010 Dante refers to it as they did refer to it, Aristotle refers to 11:22.014 --> 11:23.564 as the first philosophy. 11:23.558 --> 11:29.058 They called it first because it reigns--it rules supreme among 11:29.062 --> 11:32.312 all the arts and all the sciences. 11:32.308 --> 11:34.108 It's the most important of the sciences. 11:34.110 --> 11:39.870 It's the point of arrival of all the sciences and it's called 11:39.870 --> 11:44.960 first philosophy because it explains also questions of 11:44.961 --> 11:47.671 origins, and you see the language of 11:47.674 --> 11:49.314 origins here, the origin of time, 11:49.313 --> 11:51.093 the origin of space, creation itself, 11:51.091 --> 11:54.091 the beginning of the world, causes, foundations, 11:54.091 --> 11:57.101 these are the-- this is the great Rome that 11:57.097 --> 11:58.627 metaphysics discusses. 11:58.629 --> 12:01.399 Dante, the interesting thing is that in the Middle Ages, 12:01.402 --> 12:03.572 and Dante has to connect it with physics. 12:03.570 --> 12:06.680 Physics is as--metaphysics really go hand in hand, 12:06.678 --> 12:08.558 one tries to give the explanation of the physical 12:08.557 --> 12:10.657 world, and metaphysics the 12:10.659 --> 12:13.239 theoretical, general rules. 12:13.240 --> 12:17.280 In fact, and this you probably--I should mention this. 12:17.278 --> 12:22.688 There are people who believe that metaphysics was not a term 12:22.686 --> 12:27.356 that really indicated anything really different, 12:27.360 --> 12:31.660 completely different from the knowledge that physics provides. 12:31.658 --> 12:34.518 They would say that was--metaphysics was called 12:34.522 --> 12:38.502 metaphysics because it--the book was placed on the shelf a little 12:38.504 --> 12:40.624 bit after the book on physics. 12:40.620 --> 12:41.420 You see what I mean? 12:41.418 --> 12:45.948 It was really more a way of defining the place of the book 12:45.947 --> 12:51.277 on the library so to speak, probably, but it was known as 12:51.278 --> 12:53.668 that, but it's probably more of a 12:53.673 --> 12:55.423 fiction than anything else. 12:55.418 --> 12:59.928 The fact is that there is such a science for Dante that deals 12:59.931 --> 13:02.791 with causes, origins, beginnings, time, 13:02.788 --> 13:03.388 etc. 13:03.389 --> 13:07.519 One of the things that here we have it's that Dante-- 13:07.519 --> 13:10.599 that Beatrice starts describing line 100, 13:10.600 --> 13:12.230 "'The nature of the universe," 13:12.227 --> 13:13.687 here she placed the cosmologies, 13:13.690 --> 13:18.720 "which holds the center still and moves all else around 13:18.717 --> 13:20.517 it, begins here,'" 13:20.524 --> 13:22.914 so this is already the beginning, 13:22.908 --> 13:24.698 literally the language of beginnings. 13:24.700 --> 13:27.760 Here begins motion. 13:27.759 --> 13:32.699 Dante stands at the boundary of the physical universe and now 13:32.702 --> 13:35.672 she gives and explanation of this. 13:35.668 --> 13:37.328 She just said he's at the boundary, 13:37.330 --> 13:40.980 "And this heaven has no other where," 13:40.980 --> 13:44.250 place, "but the Divine Mind." 13:44.250 --> 13:50.690 The real beginning, the real universe is in God's 13:50.687 --> 13:53.957 mind, so he distinguishes two worlds, 13:53.962 --> 13:57.662 the physical world we see and the spiritual world, 13:57.659 --> 13:58.859 which is in God's mind. 13:58.860 --> 14:04.650 In a way, and just to make it very simple, Dante is journeying 14:04.647 --> 14:06.827 into the mind of God. 14:06.830 --> 14:09.120 There is one man who had written a text, 14:09.120 --> 14:12.580 Bonaventure, whom you have seen--whom you 14:12.581 --> 14:17.001 have met before and he wrote this book called The 14:16.995 --> 14:20.365 Itinerary of The Mind into God. 14:20.370 --> 14:24.230 This is a way of trying to explore, to enter, 14:24.225 --> 14:27.375 mystically enter, the mind of God. 14:27.379 --> 14:29.619 Dante doesn't do it in a mystical way. 14:29.620 --> 14:34.160 He tries to understand what's beyond the physical world. 14:34.158 --> 14:37.728 To give a description of this universe this is the term that 14:37.734 --> 14:40.464 keeps reappearing in the next three cantos. 14:40.460 --> 14:44.380 "Light and love enclose it in a circle, 14:44.379 --> 14:47.399 as it does the others, and of the girding He that 14:47.398 --> 14:50.038 girds it is the soul Intelligence." 14:50.038 --> 14:55.408 This primum mobile, it really is a kind of curve 14:55.409 --> 14:59.189 that wraps up all the other heavens. 14:59.190 --> 15:03.170 We have seen--this is the ninth heaven, all the other heavens 15:03.167 --> 15:06.747 have been--are enwrapped within it, but it's not only a 15:06.748 --> 15:09.428 boundary; Dante views it as also the 15:09.426 --> 15:13.126 beginning, the threshold for the spiritual universe. 15:13.129 --> 15:17.559 It's both the boundary of the physical world and it's always 15:17.558 --> 15:22.458 also the-- so it goes like this, 15:22.460 --> 15:27.820 this is the Earth, and growing, 15:27.815 --> 15:35.535 and then we come to the ninth this becomes at the same time a 15:35.541 --> 15:40.951 kind of convex and concave semi circle. 15:40.950 --> 15:44.860 I have, believe it or not, a shape of what I think is 15:44.861 --> 15:47.271 Dante's cosmos and here it is. 15:47.269 --> 15:49.699 This is--I'm going to pass it around. 15:49.700 --> 15:54.520 This is a shell but it's actually really made and found. 15:54.519 --> 15:58.549 This would be the--pass it around here and then I'll 15:58.549 --> 16:03.949 explain-- they're all spirals really like 16:03.951 --> 16:06.841 the-- since Dante thinks of the 16:06.841 --> 16:11.031 cosmos as a book and we would call it a cosmobook, 16:11.028 --> 16:17.228 that's a neology that I coin here, a kind of cosmobook. 16:17.230 --> 16:21.530 The book in the shape of a cosmos, it's really a parchment 16:21.528 --> 16:23.488 rolled up within itself. 16:23.490 --> 16:29.080 You know what parchments are in medieval and classical ideas of 16:29.075 --> 16:32.765 the production, the material production of 16:32.769 --> 16:33.669 books? 16:33.668 --> 16:38.328 We have the ancient parchments which are all rolled up 16:38.331 --> 16:43.521 like--the term is around a stick and then held together by a 16:43.519 --> 16:46.509 ring, that's really the shape. 16:46.509 --> 16:50.339 It's a sort of a production of books that in the history of the 16:50.341 --> 16:53.741 book is later replaced around the fourth century A.D. 16:53.740 --> 16:57.270 by the so called codex which we have for instance even in the 16:57.272 --> 16:57.922 Beinecke. 16:57.918 --> 17:04.078 A codex has--it's made of quartos, it's made of folios and 17:04.076 --> 17:10.336 divided like a book today made of--it would have quartos or 17:10.340 --> 17:11.530 folios. 17:11.528 --> 17:13.538 If you go and see the Shakespeare's-- 17:13.538 --> 17:18.878 the folios of Shakespeare in the Elizabethan Club, 17:18.880 --> 17:20.960 for instance, if they let you go in or you 17:20.964 --> 17:24.774 belong there, take a look and see what the 17:24.766 --> 17:26.576 codex really is. 17:26.578 --> 17:29.188 Dante seems to be combining the two forms. 17:29.190 --> 17:33.190 Anyway, you have an idea here of what the shape that I'm 17:33.186 --> 17:35.436 trying to describe to you is. 17:35.440 --> 17:38.890 They are a kind of, if you wish, 17:38.892 --> 17:43.482 they are spirals, one following the other, 17:43.476 --> 17:49.266 and next to it there is going to be a spiritual universe, 17:49.269 --> 17:51.709 another universe which we'll come to in a moment. 17:51.710 --> 17:54.670 This is the first description that she's giving. 17:54.670 --> 17:57.250 The idea of the sphericity of space, 17:57.250 --> 18:01.280 that's one thing, the space is spherical and has 18:01.284 --> 18:06.524 as the primum mobile as a boundary and now we have-- 18:06.519 --> 18:10.129 Beatrice goes on explaining, "Its motion is not 18:10.130 --> 18:13.740 determined by another's," this is line 112, 18:13.740 --> 18:16.160 "but from it the rest have their measures." 18:16.160 --> 18:18.550 Everything begins here. 18:18.548 --> 18:21.828 This is the physical beginning of the universe which we 18:21.830 --> 18:25.660 inhabit, "even as ten from the half and the fifth." 18:25.660 --> 18:28.790 In other words, it's as sure as it is that two 18:28.791 --> 18:33.041 plus five make ten and "how time should have its roots in 18:33.038 --> 18:36.238 that vessel and in the others its leaves, 18:36.240 --> 18:37.470 may not be plain to thee." 18:37.470 --> 18:43.450 Even time begins here; time is understood then by 18:43.451 --> 18:44.091 Dante. 18:44.088 --> 18:50.558 Do you see what the--there is a kind of a tree growing from a 18:50.555 --> 18:53.675 part, the part of eternity. 18:53.680 --> 18:57.930 He does not understand time in a linear way, 18:57.934 --> 19:03.674 there was a beginning and an end, and it's not the wheel of 19:03.674 --> 19:07.044 time or the wheel of becoming. 19:07.038 --> 19:09.618 You may have heard this, have you heard this description 19:09.621 --> 19:12.531 about the wheel of becoming in which this is a platonic idea of 19:12.529 --> 19:15.059 time, where all things are contained? 19:15.058 --> 19:19.168 Dante thinks of the tree, of time as a tree, 19:19.170 --> 19:24.190 the roots of which are in the pot of eternity and the foliages 19:24.186 --> 19:27.016 are in-- reach us--reach into our own 19:27.018 --> 19:27.518 world. 19:27.519 --> 19:31.339 We are in the shadow of the tree of time. 19:31.338 --> 19:36.408 We only see leaves that will fall because this idea of the 19:36.410 --> 19:39.790 dispersion and the falling of time, 19:39.788 --> 19:44.558 the passing of time, so this is the definition of 19:44.556 --> 19:46.936 what happens in XXVII. 19:46.940 --> 19:50.060 She continues after a while with this-- 19:50.058 --> 19:56.308 about once again the language of covetousness and moral 19:56.307 --> 20:02.897 language about what happens in the world and we move on to 20:02.903 --> 20:04.873 Canto XXVIII. 20:04.868 --> 20:08.518 Let me tell you I have not forgotten that we ought to talk 20:08.520 --> 20:10.700 about Ulysses in a little while. 20:10.700 --> 20:18.150 Now it continues with, XXVIII deals with the angelic 20:18.146 --> 20:19.896 hierarchy. 20:19.900 --> 20:24.370 We are now still in the primum mobile but Dante 20:24.371 --> 20:28.671 starts seeing into the other universe, the spiritual 20:28.673 --> 20:29.773 universe. 20:29.769 --> 20:34.729 He sees a universe which is adjacent to the physical 20:34.730 --> 20:38.330 universe with--inhabited by angels. 20:38.328 --> 20:43.148 The corresponding part that you have the nine planets, 20:43.150 --> 20:46.300 the seven planets plus the fixed stars and the crystalline 20:46.297 --> 20:48.497 heaven, and now you have the nine 20:48.502 --> 20:51.612 orders of angels, and Beatrice will go on 20:51.611 --> 20:54.751 describing the three triads of angels; 20:54.750 --> 20:58.400 angels, archangels, thrones, this is the language 20:58.395 --> 21:02.055 that comes from the Bible, the Old Testament comes from 21:02.060 --> 21:05.440 Babylonian, apparently in Persian sources, 21:05.443 --> 21:10.763 apocalyptic sources and would not seem to be really terribly 21:10.763 --> 21:13.743 different from that tradition. 21:13.740 --> 21:18.950 Here, we have also another; this whole description of the 21:18.954 --> 21:23.774 angelic order continues, line 12 let me just focus on 21:23.773 --> 21:26.633 this a bit, "And when I turned again 21:26.626 --> 21:29.746 and mine were met by what appears in that revolving sphere 21:29.747 --> 21:32.317 to one that looks intently on its circling, 21:32.319 --> 21:37.569 I saw a point," distance, so we are at the boundary of 21:37.568 --> 21:40.848 the universe; another universe emerges into 21:40.852 --> 21:46.252 view and Dante only sees "a point which radiated a light so 21:46.246 --> 21:50.776 keen that the eye in which it burns must close for its 21:50.784 --> 21:53.014 piercing power." 21:53.009 --> 21:56.389 Once again, a series of revolving spheres, 21:56.394 --> 22:00.284 this universe is not the projection of the other 22:00.276 --> 22:04.796 universe; they are separate and adjacent. 22:04.798 --> 22:10.238 They are two hemispheres and this is what happens in Canto 22:10.243 --> 22:15.883 XXVIII and we go to Canto XXIX, and I ask you to see how the 22:15.880 --> 22:18.650 whole argument continues. 22:18.650 --> 22:24.180 Beatrice has been explaining breathlessly the whole question 22:24.180 --> 22:29.630 of angelic hierarchy, and by the end of Canto XXVIII 22:29.632 --> 22:32.402 he sees-- she even mentions that the 22:32.397 --> 22:36.447 order--actually it's Dante here who mentions that the order-- 22:36.450 --> 22:39.690 his ordering of angels, the hierarchy, 22:39.690 --> 22:42.750 is very different from the one of the pseudo Dionysius, 22:42.750 --> 22:45.790 line 130 where he says, "These orders all gaze 22:45.788 --> 22:49.428 above and so prevail below that all are drawn and all draw to 22:49.432 --> 22:49.922 God. 22:49.920 --> 22:53.470 And Dionysius set himself with such zeal to contemplate," 22:53.468 --> 22:56.548 this is the pseudo Dionysius who had written about the 22:56.550 --> 22:59.700 angelic hierarchy, and Dante goes on to say that 22:59.698 --> 23:02.988 he differs from him, that he just--his idea of 23:02.988 --> 23:07.438 angels is a little different from his and Pope Gregory's. 23:07.440 --> 23:11.310 A statement of his own intellectual independence, 23:11.309 --> 23:15.259 both in terms of the theologian and in terms of an 23:15.260 --> 23:17.600 ecclesiastical authority. 23:17.598 --> 23:23.678 And then Beatrice finishes the description of this hierarchy, 23:23.680 --> 23:27.250 meaning the sacred order, that's what the Greek word 23:27.250 --> 23:31.870 means, the sacred order of angelic 23:31.865 --> 23:34.075 intelligences. 23:34.078 --> 23:38.648 Their function is to impart motion to the spheres; 23:38.650 --> 23:43.550 their function is to move between the divinity and human 23:43.548 --> 23:46.328 beings, they are the messengers, 23:46.326 --> 23:50.406 they keep the spiritual entities and they keep moving 23:50.414 --> 23:55.294 between God and human beings and then we go to Canto XXIX where 23:55.288 --> 24:00.398 now the language of cosmology, about the order of the cosmos 24:00.403 --> 24:04.793 becomes creation, and I want to show this to you. 24:04.788 --> 24:08.378 However, this shift to the language of creation is 24:08.377 --> 24:12.037 conducted in an extraordinarily interesting way. 24:12.038 --> 24:15.968 Dante wants to say that Beatrice has been talking 24:15.968 --> 24:19.318 nonstop about-- with probably a touch of 24:19.317 --> 24:22.497 playfulness about the angelic orders, 24:22.500 --> 24:26.230 and then she moves almost like, without catching her breath, 24:26.230 --> 24:30.520 talking about creation, Canto XXIX. 24:30.519 --> 24:36.119 But look how this shift from the order of angels to the order 24:36.118 --> 24:38.638 of creation is described. 24:38.640 --> 24:40.600 This is the beginning of Canto XXIX, 24:40.598 --> 24:43.848 "When the two children of Latona, 24:43.848 --> 24:47.008 covered by the Ram and by the Scales, 24:47.009 --> 24:50.909 both at once make a belt of the horizon, 24:50.910 --> 24:55.880 as long as from the moment when the zenith holds them balanced 24:55.876 --> 24:59.526 till the one and the other, changing hemispheres, 24:59.529 --> 25:01.489 are unbalanced from that girdle, 25:01.490 --> 25:05.010 for so long, have face illumined with a 25:05.007 --> 25:07.557 smile, Beatrice kept silence, 25:07.555 --> 25:11.995 looking fixedly at the point that had overcome me." 25:12.000 --> 25:14.340 What an extraordinary image. 25:14.338 --> 25:16.728 Let's read it again so we make sure that we understand it 25:16.729 --> 25:18.649 because I'm not sure that it's very clear, 25:18.650 --> 25:23.750 though I think it's--I can make it clear but let's look at this 25:23.750 --> 25:24.410 again. 25:24.410 --> 25:26.180 "When the two children of Latona," 25:26.178 --> 25:28.768 meaning the Sun and the Moon, that's really what he's saying. 25:28.769 --> 25:33.459 He has to describe the fact that Beatrice seems not to have 25:33.461 --> 25:37.591 kept quiet that she went endlessly from one thing to 25:37.587 --> 25:40.277 another, that's what I call the 25:40.279 --> 25:42.739 playfulness of Dante's thinking. 25:42.740 --> 25:48.010 He's saying that there was, this is the image that he uses, 25:48.010 --> 25:52.370 is when the children of Latona, Apollo and Diana, 25:52.374 --> 25:56.014 you know that, the Sun and the Moon. 25:56.009 --> 25:58.729 We're in the universe of--though Dante is using 25:58.729 --> 26:01.509 mythical language, look at the language first of 26:01.507 --> 26:01.977 all. 26:01.980 --> 26:04.470 The two children of Latona, myth; 26:04.470 --> 26:06.680 "Covered by the Ram and the Scales," 26:06.679 --> 26:09.049 science, "Both at once make a belt 26:09.045 --> 26:11.895 of the horizon," an Arabic word meaning the 26:11.904 --> 26:15.434 boundary of the heavens, so science, scientific language. 26:15.430 --> 26:17.960 "As long as from that moment when the zenith," 26:17.964 --> 26:18.984 scientific language. 26:18.980 --> 26:22.750 The mixture and balancing of science and myth, 26:22.750 --> 26:26.010 but also a way of talking about the-- 26:26.009 --> 26:32.459 a balance that is as vanishing and as fleeting as it could ever 26:32.464 --> 26:34.864 be, that's the point. 26:34.858 --> 26:38.778 That there was silence but he could almost not even tell that 26:38.779 --> 26:41.459 there was a break in Beatrice's speech. 26:41.460 --> 26:45.700 This is what he is saying, when the two children of 26:45.701 --> 26:52.771 Latona, the Sun or Apollo and the Moon, 26:52.772 --> 26:55.692 Diana, along the horizon, 26:55.693 --> 26:59.273 they seem to be aligned together and they are held 26:59.270 --> 27:01.170 together by the zenith. 27:01.170 --> 27:04.190 This is the zenith, the highest point as opposed to 27:04.191 --> 27:05.341 the nadir, right? 27:05.338 --> 27:09.688 This is the balance that he's describing. 27:09.690 --> 27:14.650 They are kept in a balance here, in a rare equilibrium, 27:14.650 --> 27:17.800 when they appear, seemed to be aligned together 27:17.795 --> 27:21.825 and that balance and equilibrium is quickly disappearing. 27:21.829 --> 27:23.459 What is he saying? 27:23.460 --> 27:27.920 He's saying that she almost didn't stop speaking and then 27:27.920 --> 27:32.540 she began, then she goes on with the theory of creation. 27:32.538 --> 27:35.318 "I tell, not ask, what you wouldst hear; 27:35.318 --> 27:38.358 for I have seen it there where every ubi and every 27:38.355 --> 27:40.575 quando is centred," place, 27:40.578 --> 27:42.738 I have seen at a point where place, 27:42.740 --> 27:44.940 space, and time coincide. 27:44.940 --> 27:47.600 "Not to gain any good for Himself, 27:47.598 --> 27:50.278 which cannot be, but that His splendour, 27:50.279 --> 27:52.169 shining back, might say," 27:52.167 --> 27:54.097 I stay, "Subsisto--in His 27:54.096 --> 27:55.266 eternity, beyond time, 27:55.269 --> 27:58.239 beyond every other bound, as it pleased Him, 27:58.240 --> 28:02.500 the Eternal Love revealed Himself in new loves." 28:02.500 --> 28:07.490 I have to correct my good friend, dear old friend 28:07.493 --> 28:13.013 Sinclair, because actually Dante does not say that. 28:13.009 --> 28:18.899 He says that love, the eternal love, 28:18.900 --> 28:21.470 actually the language which he uses I don't know-- 28:21.470 --> 28:23.530 I hope your other translations--those of you who 28:23.526 --> 28:25.186 use other translations are luckier, 28:25.190 --> 28:30.060 "opened itself in new loves," opened itself. 28:30.058 --> 28:36.228 I take this to be a sexual language as it can be found, 28:36.230 --> 28:42.400 a new love engendered, opened itself into new loves. 28:42.400 --> 28:45.410 Then it in fact continues, "Nor, before, 28:45.413 --> 28:49.143 did He lie as it were inert; for until God's moving upon 28:49.135 --> 28:52.275 these waters there was no 'before' or 'after.'" 28:52.282 --> 28:55.432 Before God's creation the language is biblical, 28:55.430 --> 28:57.650 from Genesis, there was no before or nor 28:57.653 --> 28:58.113 after. 28:58.108 --> 29:00.668 In the physics, this is an allusion to 29:00.672 --> 29:04.072 Aristotle's physics, where Aristotle has to define 29:04.066 --> 29:06.686 time; he says it's the measure, 29:06.690 --> 29:10.850 we speak of time when there is a before and an after, 29:10.848 --> 29:13.968 because this is really what time is. 29:13.970 --> 29:19.730 The measure of motion in regard to a before and an after; 29:19.730 --> 29:22.730 Dante says that before this time of creation there was no 29:22.731 --> 29:23.431 such thing. 29:23.430 --> 29:28.650 It could not be distinguished before in terms of time, 29:28.650 --> 29:30.320 there was no such a thing as before and after, 29:30.318 --> 29:33.058 and then he goes on just to continue with this sexual 29:33.057 --> 29:35.347 metaphor, "Form and matter, 29:35.345 --> 29:38.785 united and separate, came into being that had no 29:38.785 --> 29:40.675 defect, like three arrows from a 29:40.680 --> 29:42.090 three-stringed bow." 29:42.088 --> 29:45.538 The question of creation as a coming together of form and 29:45.538 --> 29:48.248 matter is here described as a conjunction. 29:48.250 --> 29:51.730 It's the language of creation takes place as an act of love, 29:51.726 --> 29:54.256 that's the first thing Beatrice's saying. 29:54.259 --> 29:57.959 Creation comes through as passion, a love passion, 29:57.961 --> 30:02.041 it's an opening up in--love opening up in new loves. 30:02.038 --> 30:05.668 It's as physical, the language of creation, 30:05.671 --> 30:10.771 as it could ever be in terms of the natural, the language of 30:10.770 --> 30:14.230 natural production and reproduction. 30:14.230 --> 30:17.730 This is the context of what she is saying, before and after. 30:17.730 --> 30:22.780 It is as if to have a creation, creation is that which 30:22.775 --> 30:28.485 introduces the possibility of distinguishing between a before 30:28.486 --> 30:32.846 and an after, introduces a difference, 30:32.846 --> 30:37.366 that's what the language of Beatrice is. 30:37.368 --> 30:40.388 Let me go back to the image with which we started. 30:40.390 --> 30:48.010 Dante is wondering whether or not there was any break in 30:48.009 --> 30:50.779 Beatrice's speech. 30:50.779 --> 30:55.219 He says if there was a break, it was so fleeting as happens 30:55.222 --> 30:59.442 with whenever the Sun and the Moon along the line of the 30:59.438 --> 31:03.448 horizon are going to be-- are aligned together and this 31:03.448 --> 31:07.028 is if they are balanced and are held together by the zenith 31:07.025 --> 31:07.575 above. 31:07.578 --> 31:11.128 That is such a fleeting moment in the alignment of the stars. 31:11.130 --> 31:13.690 Why this metaphor? 31:13.690 --> 31:18.500 Not only he's saying that but I think there is also an allusion 31:18.502 --> 31:20.912 to Francesca here in Canto V. 31:20.910 --> 31:22.380 Did you catch it? 31:22.380 --> 31:24.970 Where he says, "for so long her face 31:24.967 --> 31:28.587 illumined with a smile, Beatrice kept silence," 31:28.594 --> 31:32.824 she just kept on talking, "looking fixedly at the 31:32.817 --> 31:35.667 point that had overcome me." 31:35.670 --> 31:40.540 The point that had overcome me is clearly an allusion to--not 31:40.539 --> 31:45.089 only a point was that that overcame us, Francesca says in 31:45.085 --> 31:46.055 Canto V. 31:46.058 --> 31:49.458 That's all, so there's an illusion to Francesca. 31:49.460 --> 31:53.110 The question that I have to answer that I raised with you is 31:53.106 --> 31:56.876 why is Dante mentioning these two infernal figures and framing 31:56.877 --> 31:59.657 his discussion on cosmology of creation, 31:59.660 --> 32:02.890 first of all by talking about Ulysses and now talking about, 32:02.890 --> 32:04.720 or alluding to, not even mentioning, 32:04.720 --> 32:07.550 but alluding to Francesca. 32:07.548 --> 32:11.448 Why this one who wants to transgress and trespass the 32:11.450 --> 32:14.750 boundaries of the world in order to know, 32:14.750 --> 32:19.610 the other one who transgresses the norms of what is allowed 32:19.611 --> 32:21.121 because of love. 32:21.118 --> 32:25.128 Knowledge and love somehow come into play but they are in the 32:25.128 --> 32:26.798 Inferno version. 32:26.798 --> 32:29.018 What is he saying though with this image? 32:29.019 --> 32:33.949 Why has he talked about Francesca, the Sun and the Moon 32:33.949 --> 32:38.239 align briefly, what do you think he's saying? 32:38.240 --> 32:43.600 It's not a rhetorical question; let me just--why do you think 32:43.597 --> 32:45.617 he would use this kind of language? 32:45.618 --> 32:48.048 Immediately, after Beatrice goes on 32:48.048 --> 32:51.978 explaining the creation of the world and the distinction 32:51.980 --> 32:54.410 between a before and an after. 32:54.410 --> 32:55.620 Why this metaphor? 32:55.619 --> 32:57.829 Why this long paragraph? 32:57.829 --> 33:03.879 This image here, anybody? 33:03.880 --> 33:08.900 I think that Dante's asking right here, 33:08.900 --> 33:14.210 is it possible to localize a break and he's saying it is as 33:14.212 --> 33:19.802 when we speak that things seem to be continuous and just as in 33:19.800 --> 33:25.300 every syllable between a sound and another there is always an 33:25.298 --> 33:30.518 interval so there was in the language of Beatrice, 33:30.519 --> 33:34.099 and that's what to him is the idea of creation. 33:34.098 --> 33:37.568 It seems to be--there is--the opposite of creation would be 33:37.567 --> 33:40.797 the eternity of the world, something which would be the 33:40.795 --> 33:44.325 universe is eternal; it has no beginning and no 33:44.332 --> 33:45.952 identifiable break. 33:45.950 --> 33:46.980 How can you tell? 33:46.980 --> 33:52.840 If the universe is eternal you have no differences inside it. 33:52.838 --> 33:57.788 Dante wants to say it seems to be a continuous--the universe 33:57.794 --> 34:01.074 seems to have a continuous extension. 34:01.068 --> 34:05.478 Without time a kind of eternity, it goes on and on, 34:05.480 --> 34:10.690 and yet it's as when we speak that you can identify the break, 34:10.690 --> 34:15.690 there was however minute there was a break between Beatrice's 34:15.690 --> 34:20.440 exposition about the angelic orders and now the exposition 34:20.442 --> 34:24.612 that she goes into about the-- about creation. 34:24.610 --> 34:28.100 Why then, the other two metaphors, now it's time to 34:28.097 --> 34:31.717 answer that question, why talking through Ulysses and 34:31.722 --> 34:32.702 Francesca? 34:32.699 --> 34:34.669 Why evoke those two images? 34:34.670 --> 34:40.170 I wish we could--I have to keep that hanging awhile so it can 34:40.170 --> 34:44.940 become a little bit more compelling what I'm going to 34:44.938 --> 34:46.128 tell you. 34:46.130 --> 34:49.330 With it order, "And as a ray 34:49.326 --> 34:53.316 shines," Beatrice is continuing with 34:53.322 --> 34:57.352 form and matter, united and separate, 34:57.349 --> 35:01.779 this is conjoined and pure, pure and conjoined. 35:01.780 --> 35:04.880 She says, "as a ray shines into glass or amber or crystal 35:04.876 --> 35:07.616 so that from its coming to its completeness there is no 35:07.619 --> 35:09.949 interval, so the threefold creation 35:09.952 --> 35:14.042 flashed into being from its Lord all at once without distinction 35:14.041 --> 35:15.341 in its beginning. 35:15.340 --> 35:19.130 With it, order was created and ordained for the spirits, 35:19.126 --> 35:22.696 and these were the summit of the universe in whom was 35:22.704 --> 35:25.124 produced pure act; pure potency," 35:25.121 --> 35:25.931 and so on." 35:25.929 --> 35:30.059 The idea is that there is a universe of creation, 35:30.059 --> 35:34.429 the universe of creation which seems to be very much like the 35:34.429 --> 35:38.929 physical world, it's described in physical 35:38.929 --> 35:44.449 terms, the terms of the Moon and sexuality, 35:44.449 --> 35:47.399 the cosmological language and scientific terms, 35:47.400 --> 35:52.100 and yet there is some kind of difference that is introduced. 35:52.099 --> 35:54.739 Without creation we would not have differences, 35:54.739 --> 35:57.839 we would not even have origins that is the language. 35:57.840 --> 35:59.340 Now, why those two figures? 35:59.340 --> 36:05.610 Why Ulysses and Francesca? 36:05.610 --> 36:09.260 Ulysses, I think that what Dante is doing, 36:09.260 --> 36:14.690 finally is allowing us to see what the world of Inferno 36:14.690 --> 36:16.650 has to be seen as. 36:16.650 --> 36:20.360 The world of Inferno that we only saw as a world of 36:20.358 --> 36:24.158 rejected, as a world of evil and horror, 36:24.155 --> 36:29.375 all of a sudden is now retrieved as the best exemplar 36:29.382 --> 36:34.812 of what we may come to know of the spiritual world. 36:34.809 --> 36:40.049 It is almost an imaginative redemption that Dante goes into 36:40.054 --> 36:42.954 about the actual idea of hell. 36:42.949 --> 36:47.049 He's implying, and that could become in many 36:47.052 --> 36:49.932 ways heretical, but I hope to show you that it 36:49.931 --> 36:53.091 is not, that the universe as it goes 36:53.090 --> 36:57.410 back--as one goes back to the beginnings, 36:57.409 --> 37:02.969 clearly the journey to the beginnings has to be seen as 37:02.974 --> 37:07.514 redemption of order has been falling away. 37:07.510 --> 37:11.210 Let me just say it in a slightly less tortuous way. 37:11.210 --> 37:16.230 There can be no redemption unless it implies that the whole 37:16.228 --> 37:19.428 of evil is overcome and destroyed, 37:19.429 --> 37:24.039 so that even the world of hell now appears all of a sudden as 37:24.038 --> 37:28.488 part of what we get to know about the ultimate structure of 37:28.494 --> 37:29.804 the universe. 37:29.800 --> 37:34.810 This seems to me to be the real lesson, 37:34.809 --> 37:39.029 the underlying and powerful message that Dante is sending 37:39.029 --> 37:43.399 through these three cantos in the heaven of metaphysics. 37:43.400 --> 37:46.840 Let me stop here before I move into the next canto, 37:46.842 --> 37:50.702 Canto XXX and see if there are--let me take the questions 37:50.697 --> 37:53.587 now before we go on to the next canto. 37:53.590 --> 37:58.690 I could go back maybe and try to redo what I have been saying 37:58.690 --> 38:01.330 because it's-- but let me see if there are 38:01.331 --> 38:03.281 some questions and then we can do that, 38:03.280 --> 38:03.870 please. 38:03.869 --> 38:05.729 Student: Are you suggesting 38:05.731 --> 38:07.211 > 38:07.210 --> 38:15.030 of the entire world creation is redeemable including those 38:15.028 --> 38:18.868 >? 38:18.869 --> 38:20.089 Prof: He never says that. 38:20.090 --> 38:22.930 Let me be very, very clear. 38:22.929 --> 38:25.319 He never says it anywhere. 38:25.320 --> 38:28.390 38:28.389 --> 38:31.149 There is never an indication thematically, 38:31.150 --> 38:35.100 there is everything else that I have said I could find 38:35.101 --> 38:39.611 counterparts in a thematic, thematized, in the sense that 38:39.606 --> 38:44.606 it becomes part of a conscious articulation on the part of her; 38:44.610 --> 38:48.610 he knows and he thematizes, he makes it a theme clear, 38:48.612 --> 38:50.202 he never says that. 38:50.199 --> 38:56.189 But there are two implications though that I'm drawing on in 38:56.186 --> 39:01.256 order to be able to make that kind of statement. 39:01.260 --> 39:07.480 The first is the very idea of the cosmos as a sphere, 39:07.480 --> 39:10.640 and the idea of the cosmos as a sphere, 39:10.639 --> 39:14.609 it really means that wherever you are going and you are going 39:14.612 --> 39:17.442 toward God, then you are going back to the 39:17.440 --> 39:19.760 beginning, everything else can go back to 39:19.755 --> 39:21.825 the beginning because that's the form, 39:21.829 --> 39:23.109 the shape of the cosmos. 39:23.110 --> 39:27.820 I'm drawing out the implication about this understanding of the 39:27.822 --> 39:28.662 universe. 39:28.659 --> 39:32.959 The other reason is that there is such a thing as a redemption 39:32.961 --> 39:35.661 and Dante's-- we didn't read the canto, 39:35.657 --> 39:39.327 Canto VII of Paradise is focused on redemption, 39:39.329 --> 39:43.089 a new beginning, that's what redemption means. 39:43.090 --> 39:46.680 Redemption means that the cosmos can go back to its 39:46.675 --> 39:50.185 beginning and be restored in its original form. 39:50.190 --> 39:54.280 If this is true, it could very well be that from 39:54.284 --> 39:59.424 the point of view of the poem, Lucifer is always going to be 39:59.422 --> 40:01.952 stuck in his ice forever. 40:01.949 --> 40:04.869 There's no hint that he can move even. 40:04.869 --> 40:09.169 Francesca is always moving around in vicious circles, 40:09.168 --> 40:13.548 remembering and then lost in the labyrinth of time. 40:13.550 --> 40:16.710 To her, she literally moves in time; 40:16.710 --> 40:20.980 memory--cannot think about the past without being moved by it 40:20.978 --> 40:23.608 and must move constantly around it. 40:23.610 --> 40:27.020 Ulysses gets lost who knows where, 40:27.018 --> 40:31.308 there is nowhere for him, he has no sense of a place, 40:31.309 --> 40:35.969 even from this point of view I can go on understanding that in 40:35.969 --> 40:40.589 a canto where a place matters, Ulysses never had a sense of 40:40.586 --> 40:44.416 belonging anywhere, that's the utter dislocation 40:44.418 --> 40:47.338 and a kind of-- he doesn't have a family that 40:47.342 --> 40:48.872 holds him back, the children, 40:48.871 --> 40:50.281 the kingdom, Ithaca, anything, 40:50.280 --> 40:52.000 he just goes on moving. 40:52.000 --> 40:55.480 That is the overt sense of the poem, 40:55.480 --> 40:58.770 but there is this theology of redemption, 40:58.768 --> 41:03.488 and I'm wondering whether theology of redemption does not 41:03.494 --> 41:08.644 entail necessarily that there is a return to the beginning. 41:08.639 --> 41:12.369 Before I go on though with restatements of this-- 41:12.369 --> 41:18.479 I want to ask you to--because I think it's one of the-- 41:18.480 --> 41:22.340 a technique that Dante uses which is really extraordinary, 41:22.340 --> 41:24.470 can you go to the beginning of canto-- 41:24.469 --> 41:32.869 the famous image of Latona when the two children of Latona-- 41:32.869 --> 41:36.469 beginning of Canto XXIX, I really would like to ask you 41:36.467 --> 41:38.997 to look at the Italian a little bit. 41:39.000 --> 41:43.050 I'm not going to read it, I'm not going to ask you to 41:43.045 --> 41:48.175 read, I'm only going to ask you to look, I won't read it though. 41:48.179 --> 41:51.659 At the first word, quando right? 41:51.659 --> 41:55.449 You all see that, and look at line-- 41:55.449 --> 41:59.479 that's really the proem, what we call rhetorically the 41:59.478 --> 42:02.618 prosthesis of the canto, the beginning of the canto, 42:02.623 --> 42:03.883 the introduction of the canto. 42:03.880 --> 42:06.650 Go to line 12, the last word, 42:06.653 --> 42:08.243 quando. 42:08.239 --> 42:14.799 Go to the first--back to the first line, the last word in 42:14.804 --> 42:17.154 that line, Latona. 42:17.150 --> 42:19.280 He says, "of Latona." 42:19.280 --> 42:22.340 The first two letters "la" 42:22.340 --> 42:26.380 go back to canto-- to line 12, the first two 42:26.380 --> 42:29.680 letters "la," draw this-- 42:29.679 --> 42:32.829 that's a chiasmus, draw the lines together, 42:32.829 --> 42:37.119 and they will meet exactly at the word hemisphere, 42:37.119 --> 42:40.329 emisfero, that's the center. 42:40.329 --> 42:44.239 That's the--hemisphere means that they are--it's 42:44.239 --> 42:48.569 half--hemi--the Greek is the two half spheres, 42:48.565 --> 42:52.805 the universe is two half spheres composing one. 42:52.809 --> 42:59.009 I think Dante's placing us at a cosmic crossroads. 42:59.010 --> 43:02.960 He is locating us, he's telling us where we are 43:02.956 --> 43:06.826 first of all, but he's also telling us that 43:06.833 --> 43:12.193 this universe has a kind of very occult and very secret laws. 43:12.190 --> 43:16.040 The poem has these secret laws that regulate it. 43:16.039 --> 43:23.639 I'm really arguing then that there is this subtext that is if 43:23.644 --> 43:31.124 a radical redemptive theology would only entail the absolute 43:31.123 --> 43:37.083 purification of evil, so that the universe will have 43:37.083 --> 43:41.973 to really go back to this kind of Pythagorean purity, 43:41.969 --> 43:44.999 but without the phases and descents. 43:45.000 --> 43:49.870 These are--you know what I mean all of you, this Pythagorean 43:49.871 --> 43:54.411 idea that the life of the universe stretches for 360,000 43:54.414 --> 43:55.244 years. 43:55.239 --> 43:56.529 Did you ever hear about that? 43:56.530 --> 44:01.530 360,000 years which are really like the days of the year, 44:01.528 --> 44:07.088 the 365 I think we have; 360,000 years. 44:07.090 --> 44:10.720 Every 360,000 years the universe rotates and goes back 44:10.724 --> 44:13.334 to its point of origin and then it-- 44:13.329 --> 44:15.759 decadence starts again, the age of gold, 44:15.760 --> 44:18.890 the age of silver, the age of iron, 44:18.889 --> 44:21.789 the age of paper we would call it now. 44:21.789 --> 44:26.259 It goes back to its origin, that's not the way Dante 44:26.259 --> 44:29.939 understands the movement of the cosmos, 44:29.940 --> 44:36.390 but he does understand the--he does present this redemptive 44:36.387 --> 44:43.387 event that makes the universe return to its pristine purity, 44:43.389 --> 44:45.759 that's why I made that statement. 44:45.760 --> 44:50.160 Any other points before I go back because I really think I 44:50.164 --> 44:53.184 should say all of what I said before. 44:53.179 --> 44:57.019 Any other questions so I can help clarify these various 44:57.018 --> 44:57.658 points? 44:57.659 --> 44:59.699 Yes. 44:59.699 --> 45:02.009 Student: What is the redemptive event? 45:02.010 --> 45:02.860 Prof: I'm sorry. 45:02.860 --> 45:04.200 Student: What is the redemptive event? 45:04.199 --> 45:05.539 Prof: The incarnation. 45:05.539 --> 45:09.889 The incarnation is the redemptive event that allows--it 45:09.894 --> 45:12.884 means what is the redemptive event? 45:12.880 --> 45:16.250 The incarnation, I call it redemptive event that 45:16.248 --> 45:19.108 would make the-- a new creation, 45:19.110 --> 45:24.870 a new Adam has come into the world and that new Adam, 45:24.869 --> 45:30.659 through the sacrifice, his sacrifice through the gift 45:30.663 --> 45:33.643 God gave-- allowed the incarnation because 45:33.643 --> 45:36.193 human beings on their own would not be capable. 45:36.190 --> 45:38.480 That's the theology of redemption. 45:38.480 --> 45:43.180 Human beings on their own would not be able to save and redeem 45:43.184 --> 45:46.814 themselves so that an intervention from God, 45:46.809 --> 45:51.119 through his son, was made inevitable in order to 45:51.117 --> 45:55.967 reconstruct and in order to bring out and produce that 45:55.974 --> 45:59.004 original order of the cosmos. 45:59.000 --> 46:00.950 If that is true, and it is true, 46:00.949 --> 46:04.409 and you only have to look at everywhere in the poem, 46:04.409 --> 46:06.639 but Canto VII of Paradise, 46:06.635 --> 46:10.385 that's really where it is an annunciation of this whole 46:10.391 --> 46:14.241 theory in the terms of-- for those of you who are, 46:14.239 --> 46:18.309 Anselm, etc., then that implies that there 46:18.313 --> 46:23.763 must be some kind of general remaking of the world. 46:23.760 --> 46:27.290 That's what I think the idea--but nonetheless this 46:27.289 --> 46:31.539 should not obscure the fact that there is a kind of a paired 46:31.541 --> 46:35.291 juxtaposition between the physical description of the 46:35.286 --> 46:39.246 world and the spiritual description of the world. 46:39.250 --> 46:42.540 There are two hemispheres and yet they are connected; 46:42.539 --> 46:44.869 the spiritual, the creation, 46:44.865 --> 46:49.775 the experience of creation is really the way of positing a 46:49.777 --> 46:53.997 distinctionary difference into the universe-- 46:54.000 --> 46:57.590 into the theory that the world is eternal. 46:57.590 --> 47:02.740 They are two conceptions that, operative in the Middle Ages, 47:02.739 --> 47:06.259 and they are really represented by-- 47:06.260 --> 47:11.250 one is by Aquinas who is a theologian but he is also a 47:11.248 --> 47:13.438 philosopher, and in fact, 47:13.440 --> 47:16.760 he could be called as the writer who wants to make a 47:16.757 --> 47:18.447 philosophical theology. 47:18.449 --> 47:23.669 He argues, he's known for the famous Suma; 47:23.670 --> 47:27.300 he wrote a track called Suma Against the Gentiles, 47:27.300 --> 47:32.550 not the Suma of Theology but Summa Contra Gentiles 47:32.550 --> 47:36.720 where he argues that the eternity of the world, 47:36.719 --> 47:39.069 the theory of the eternity of the world, 47:39.070 --> 47:40.820 that is to say there is no creation, 47:40.820 --> 47:44.700 he says could be philosophically demonstrated. 47:44.699 --> 47:49.129 It could also be philosophically repudiated. 47:49.130 --> 47:54.100 Philosophy can argue one side of it, and he goes on arguing 47:54.096 --> 47:58.886 that there is no way of thinking of--the usual questions, 47:58.891 --> 48:01.291 who created the Creator? 48:01.289 --> 48:04.569 That kind of--the oldest, these objections. 48:04.570 --> 48:10.160 However, there is a view of creation which is allowed and 48:10.163 --> 48:13.863 it's possible on account of faith, 48:13.860 --> 48:17.950 but it also allows for the thought of freedom, 48:17.949 --> 48:21.639 origins, beginnings, etc. 48:21.639 --> 48:25.569 Bonaventure picks up some of these ideas, the ideas debated 48:25.574 --> 48:29.514 in Paris in the thirteenth century around 1270 in Paris. 48:29.510 --> 48:32.450 Both of them are teachers at the university. 48:32.449 --> 48:35.029 Bonaventure says no, this is untenable, 48:35.027 --> 48:37.737 the idea of the eternity of the world. 48:37.739 --> 48:41.559 It is absolutely untenable, because if the world were 48:41.557 --> 48:45.007 eternal then we really would have no way of-- 48:45.010 --> 48:48.860 no real succession of generations, there would be 48:48.864 --> 48:52.804 endless people who have been living before us, 48:52.800 --> 48:56.760 there's no evidence for this, it would be endless forms of-- 48:56.760 --> 49:01.110 he holds, and he upholds the idea of creation. 49:01.110 --> 49:04.650 Dante intervenes into this debate and says, 49:04.650 --> 49:09.130 that it is effectively the physical world and the spiritual 49:09.126 --> 49:13.796 world are really one continuous, they're one complimentary to 49:13.797 --> 49:16.427 the other, and yet there is a difference 49:16.431 --> 49:19.601 between them, and the difference between them 49:19.603 --> 49:23.803 is the difference that he can find in Beatrice's speech, 49:23.800 --> 49:27.680 that little point of time, that little intrusion of time 49:27.679 --> 49:31.699 that distinguishes between one sound and another sound. 49:31.699 --> 49:35.079 The spiritual universe originates in the world of 49:35.083 --> 49:38.683 nature as a natural production and reproduction, 49:38.679 --> 49:42.829 all of God's love and the physical world in exactly the 49:42.833 --> 49:43.683 same way. 49:43.679 --> 49:46.179 There is a kind of symmetry. 49:46.179 --> 49:49.679 This is not Plato's inverted universe. 49:49.679 --> 49:53.569 The physical world is not Plato's inverted world, 49:53.574 --> 49:55.364 it's adjacent to it. 49:55.360 --> 50:00.920 It is as if Dante discovers that there are more dimensions 50:00.918 --> 50:06.768 to the world that we see than what medieval cosmologists, 50:06.768 --> 50:09.748 or classical cosmologists had imagined. 50:09.750 --> 50:12.960 Interestingly enough, and I don't say this is a proof 50:12.956 --> 50:15.296 for any of what I have said at all, 50:15.300 --> 50:18.260 but there's a famous nineteenth-century mathematician 50:18.260 --> 50:21.180 by the name of Riemann, a German mathematician. 50:21.179 --> 50:24.819 I don't know how many of you studied history of science, 50:24.822 --> 50:28.532 he was--he's known among other things for having been the 50:28.532 --> 50:31.052 mathematics professor of Einstein. 50:31.050 --> 50:35.550 Well he went on with a team of his students studying these 50:35.552 --> 50:39.902 cantos of the Divine Comedy to find evidence that 50:39.898 --> 50:44.638 in fact Dante had already a theory of fourth dimension, 50:44.639 --> 50:47.019 that there is the universe that we see and then there is another 50:47.023 --> 50:47.443 universe. 50:47.440 --> 50:50.930 It is almost as if the folds of books, 50:50.929 --> 50:55.179 the folds of the parchments are exactly giving an idea-- 50:55.179 --> 50:58.719 that's Riemann's, not me, an idea about what the 50:58.717 --> 51:01.877 actual structure of the universe may be. 51:01.880 --> 51:05.450 Having said this, don't forget to turn back to me 51:05.449 --> 51:09.839 my shell, the emblem of what I take very good--thank you. 51:09.840 --> 51:13.770 Let me see if there are some questions because I--we can go 51:13.773 --> 51:16.763 on now talking about some of these issues. 51:16.760 --> 51:18.190 Please. 51:18.190 --> 51:22.740 Student: I'm still not quite clear as to how in 51:22.744 --> 51:27.474 reference to Ulysses and Francesca in these cantos relate 51:27.467 --> 51:32.527 Beatrice's description of the universe and redemption back to 51:32.527 --> 51:36.907 Inferno and how the redemption of the universe 51:36.914 --> 51:42.654 necessarily implicates including Inferno as well as-- 51:42.650 --> 51:46.600 Prof: Excellent question and I really welcome your 51:46.601 --> 51:47.521 skepticism. 51:47.518 --> 51:52.318 The question is about how exactly do the figures of 51:52.324 --> 51:58.094 Ulysses and Francesca shed light on what's happening here? 51:58.090 --> 52:04.030 Is it really tenable that Dante's implying that 52:04.034 --> 52:10.244 those--that the sinners are going to be redeemed, 52:10.237 --> 52:11.527 saved? 52:11.530 --> 52:16.190 More or less that's-- Student: Yeah and why? 52:16.190 --> 52:19.510 Why they're brought up--how they fit into that explanation? 52:19.510 --> 52:23.490 Prof: Good, I figure that's a crucial 52:23.489 --> 52:24.229 issue. 52:24.230 --> 52:29.590 It's interesting that Dante should look at Ulysses and bring 52:29.592 --> 52:33.322 up the image of Ulysses in Canto XXVII. 52:33.320 --> 52:36.070 I find it interesting in that--and Dante, 52:36.072 --> 52:39.242 one can say, Dante is really unlike Ulysses. 52:39.239 --> 52:43.089 Now he probably realizes how different he is from Ulysses 52:43.092 --> 52:47.682 because Ulysses went to-- he's implying how risky his own 52:47.681 --> 52:51.651 enterprise may be which we have seen before. 52:51.650 --> 52:55.740 Ulysses was brought up in this journey in canto-- 52:55.739 --> 52:57.949 with the meeting with the dream of a siren was-- 52:57.949 --> 53:02.139 happened even before indirectly many of the-- 53:02.139 --> 53:06.259 in some other cases XXVI, in Canto I of Inferno 53:06.257 --> 53:09.187 even, and maybe we could just stop 53:09.193 --> 53:12.593 there and say well, Dante's still--that's a kind of 53:12.585 --> 53:14.025 retrospective fascination. 53:14.030 --> 53:20.230 He's looking back and pinpointing that tragic moment 53:20.231 --> 53:24.281 because-- he calls it the mad track of 53:24.280 --> 53:27.230 Ulysses, the madness implies that 53:27.226 --> 53:30.436 he--this man had violated the limits, 53:30.440 --> 53:34.640 own limits, including the limits of reason in his rational 53:34.639 --> 53:37.639 pursuit, philosophical investigation of 53:37.641 --> 53:40.661 the world, the scientific--he wants to go 53:40.663 --> 53:43.053 into the-- unpeopled world to have 53:43.052 --> 53:45.982 experience, that's the key word for him and 53:45.983 --> 53:49.513 yet that madness implies that he had been delirious, 53:49.510 --> 53:52.860 had been going off the track. 53:52.860 --> 53:57.210 Dante maybe that too, but maybe not, 53:57.210 --> 53:59.380 maybe I'm really a little safer now, 53:59.380 --> 54:02.300 I'm in the hands of Beatrice, she's guiding me, 54:02.300 --> 54:06.640 a way of trusting Beatrice so we could say that that is all 54:06.635 --> 54:11.265 true and therefore I could even see an element of relief on the 54:11.268 --> 54:13.728 part of Dante, we would even catch that. 54:13.730 --> 54:19.050 The relief is that his own adventure diminishes the epic, 54:19.045 --> 54:23.405 the Greek epic hero, he really did very little, 54:23.413 --> 54:27.973 he just went beyond the Pillars of Hercules. 54:27.969 --> 54:29.579 That's all, we could stop there. 54:29.579 --> 54:32.319 It happens though, retrospectively, 54:32.322 --> 54:36.602 we can see the story of Ulysses as also the story of a 54:36.597 --> 54:38.047 metaphysician. 54:38.050 --> 54:41.640 Dante is in the heaven of metaphysics, in what way is he 54:41.639 --> 54:44.969 in the place of--what does metaphysics deal with? 54:44.969 --> 54:48.379 It deals with place, deals with time, 54:48.380 --> 54:51.350 and then we can understand why Ulysses in Canto XXVI, 54:51.349 --> 54:56.409 he seems to be going from place to place is the metaphor that 54:56.407 --> 54:58.427 distinguishes Ulysses. 54:58.429 --> 55:01.529 Then Dante says, he's a failed metaphysician, 55:01.530 --> 55:03.750 but we understand that he really was going to the 55:03.753 --> 55:05.963 absolute, he really was trying to go 55:05.960 --> 55:08.690 where I'm going and there is nothing else. 55:08.690 --> 55:09.600 We stop there. 55:09.599 --> 55:13.739 We go to Beatrice, Dante meets--is talking to-- 55:13.739 --> 55:19.879 is listening to Beatrice in Canto XXIX and he's trying to 55:19.878 --> 55:25.798 figure out if it's possible to think of a beginning. 55:25.800 --> 55:31.110 How do things--you have the eternity of forms and you have 55:31.114 --> 55:35.464 the eternity of matter, it's very difficult to know how 55:35.463 --> 55:39.003 you could really distinguish anything that was before from 55:38.998 --> 55:41.758 what goes after, there is no such a thing as a 55:41.764 --> 55:42.874 before and an after. 55:42.869 --> 55:46.529 He tries to localize time, that's really the problem. 55:46.530 --> 55:53.110 To localize time he says that he really--Beatrice looked and 55:53.105 --> 56:00.235 reminded him of the point--there was a point of joy that overcame 56:00.237 --> 56:01.127 him. 56:01.130 --> 56:04.330 Maybe he's alluding, because the language is that of 56:04.327 --> 56:06.207 Francesca, so why Francesca? 56:06.210 --> 56:09.900 Let me just explain it at one point, maybe he's alluding to a 56:09.903 --> 56:12.493 kiss the two of them--that he remembers. 56:12.489 --> 56:15.639 It's sort of very spiritualized the context; 56:15.639 --> 56:18.429 Dante's never vulgar, maybe he's just alluding to a 56:18.434 --> 56:21.554 kiss they had been exchanging, or maybe the will, 56:21.554 --> 56:24.744 the desire, the longing to have a kiss now, 56:24.739 --> 56:26.179 exchange a kiss with her. 56:26.179 --> 56:29.419 One thing is clear, that he's thinking of Francesca 56:29.418 --> 56:33.368 as also a kind of metaphysician because that's what we are. 56:33.369 --> 56:36.159 What is the metaphysics of Francesca? 56:36.159 --> 56:38.469 Metaphysics of desire, first of all, 56:38.471 --> 56:42.501 a desire that--what does it mean the metaphysics of desire? 56:42.500 --> 56:46.540 Desire by its own definition is metaphysical in the sense that 56:46.541 --> 56:50.251 it's always moving beyond the objects it gains because it 56:50.253 --> 56:52.443 burns up the various objects. 56:52.440 --> 56:54.620 Today I want this book, then I want another book, 56:54.619 --> 56:56.659 and then I want the car, and then I want the library, 56:56.659 --> 57:00.529 etc., that's the infinite movement of desire which is what 57:00.528 --> 57:04.088 we call metaphysics of desire, so she's a metaphysician. 57:04.090 --> 57:06.570 Not only she's as metaphysician, 57:06.570 --> 57:10.490 she lives in time, so she's a complimentary figure 57:10.489 --> 57:11.689 to Ulysses. 57:11.690 --> 57:13.840 Ulysses is, you remember, is > 57:13.840 --> 57:19.010 Cauta, I left behind me Seville and then I, etc., 57:19.012 --> 57:19.662 etc. 57:19.659 --> 57:23.419 Now, Francesca instead says how difficult it is to remember the 57:23.418 --> 57:24.568 joys of the past. 57:24.570 --> 57:28.200 I remember I was reading, that day I began reading, 57:28.199 --> 57:31.519 that day I stopped reading, only a point was that that 57:31.519 --> 57:35.349 overcame at that point of time, a point of the book, etc. 57:35.349 --> 57:38.869 Maybe Dante's really saying she too is another failed 57:38.867 --> 57:39.947 metaphysician. 57:39.949 --> 57:44.419 They would like to be where I am now, both Francesca and 57:44.423 --> 57:49.553 Ulysses, so we are bringing them to the place where Dante is. 57:49.550 --> 57:54.510 Now, they are looking for the same thing he is having now, 57:54.510 --> 57:56.810 a conjunction of time and eternity, 57:56.809 --> 57:59.739 space and time, ubi and quando, 57:59.739 --> 58:02.609 to see the point where all things cohere. 58:02.610 --> 58:05.450 That's exactly where he is looking. 58:05.449 --> 58:07.749 How do I make things cohere? 58:07.750 --> 58:12.470 Of course it's possible to think--one way of thinking of 58:12.465 --> 58:17.775 Paradise and the joy of the blessed is to go on thinking 58:17.782 --> 58:20.912 that my joy-- suppose that I were saved, 58:20.913 --> 58:22.783 a very unlikely proposition. 58:22.780 --> 58:28.340 My joy, it's possible to argue, is increased by-- 58:28.340 --> 58:30.680 it's sadistic, the view of those who are 58:30.679 --> 58:34.159 suffering, mercifully, I am saying that to 58:34.155 --> 58:39.375 me it's the most improbable form of beatitude but it's likely 58:39.375 --> 58:45.025 that seeing someone downtrodden and punished right like that, 58:45.030 --> 58:48.300 could be that Dante is saying, how lucky I am that I'm neither 58:48.300 --> 58:50.500 like Ulysses nor like really Francesca. 58:50.500 --> 58:53.460 I don't think that that's Dante though. 58:53.460 --> 58:58.310 He's talking about cosmology and creation, 58:58.309 --> 59:02.229 the order of everything, how this order is an order of 59:02.231 --> 59:06.301 love and now he's coming to know this order of love, 59:06.300 --> 59:09.680 because now knowledge is love and love is knowledge. 59:09.679 --> 59:14.489 I think that by the allusion to them he's also saying that here 59:14.485 --> 59:18.735 on earth you can grant me that, that's what I said before, 59:18.737 --> 59:21.847 and I think that I'm not pushing it to the point of 59:21.847 --> 59:23.027 unbelievability. 59:23.030 --> 59:24.710 The whole argument becomes unbelievable, 59:24.710 --> 59:27.910 I can stay here and say, well now--what he's really 59:27.909 --> 59:31.559 saying is that I am here and I see how things go here, 59:31.559 --> 59:34.409 but I know that sinful people on Earth, 59:34.409 --> 59:37.709 those of us who live in the shadows of time, 59:37.710 --> 59:42.390 this tree and we're under the leaves of time, 59:42.389 --> 59:48.279 then I know that in a sinful way they were trying to do and 59:48.280 --> 59:52.650 know what I now have come to do and know. 59:52.650 --> 59:55.070 I could stop here and say well we're all happy, 59:55.074 --> 59:57.764 there's no argument, I think that that makes logical 59:57.762 --> 59:58.292 sense. 59:58.289 --> 1:00:02.919 I can push it to the point of absurdity, 1:00:02.920 --> 1:00:07.980 to say look maybe if this is true, he's also saying not only 1:00:07.978 --> 1:00:11.548 that they in a shadowy way, in a dim way, 1:00:11.554 --> 1:00:16.124 were anticipating the real happiness in the sinful modes, 1:00:16.119 --> 1:00:19.549 the sinners, but that maybe they too if you 1:00:19.554 --> 1:00:23.674 move out of this text-- as you know this is not said in 1:00:23.668 --> 1:00:27.928 the text that they too will be-- are going to be taken and 1:00:27.929 --> 1:00:33.039 placed into the bosom of Abraham where all the blessed dwell. 1:00:33.039 --> 1:00:37.099 Maybe too this is--is it my wishful thinking? 1:00:37.099 --> 1:00:40.159 I grant you, it's probably wishful thinking 1:00:40.161 --> 1:00:44.611 but I do have the theology of redemption behind me that stands 1:00:44.606 --> 1:00:48.686 as uttered by Dante in Canto VII of Paradise. 1:00:48.690 --> 1:00:53.960 I restated the whole thing in two minutes, that's not bad. 1:00:53.960 --> 1:00:55.070 Thank you. 1:00:55.070 --> 1:01:00.110 Other questions before we go back to--please. 1:01:00.110 --> 1:01:02.320 Student: Can you comment on the presence of 1:01:02.320 --> 1:01:05.240 Francesca, also in light of this sexual language that comes out? 1:01:05.239 --> 1:01:09.409 Prof: Yes, can I comment about Francesca 1:01:09.411 --> 1:01:14.581 in the fact that there is--the creation is given in sexual 1:01:14.581 --> 1:01:15.491 terms. 1:01:15.489 --> 1:01:21.379 That this is love that opens itself--opens itself to new 1:01:21.380 --> 1:01:23.310 loves and so on. 1:01:23.309 --> 1:01:29.889 I cannot help but play a little bit of an etymological game too, 1:01:29.891 --> 1:01:36.061 by the way, because this is the world of origins and I don't 1:01:36.056 --> 1:01:38.246 want to lose you. 1:01:38.250 --> 1:01:41.060 I know there is only one class but I don't want to lose you. 1:01:41.059 --> 1:01:44.269 Of course the only--the way in which Dante's conveying all 1:01:44.268 --> 1:01:47.138 these senses is by playing with the etymologies, 1:01:47.139 --> 1:01:51.169 because etymology is the science of the origin of words, 1:01:51.170 --> 1:01:53.330 so let me give you only one. 1:01:53.329 --> 1:01:56.719 I corrected my good friend Sinclair, 1:01:56.719 --> 1:01:59.419 inseparable from me, I mean, I'm never going to 1:01:59.418 --> 1:02:01.188 betray him, but I have to correct him 1:02:01.192 --> 1:02:02.572 because he says "revealed," 1:02:02.565 --> 1:02:03.475 that's what he means. 1:02:03.480 --> 1:02:07.850 The eternal love revealed itself a new love. 1:02:07.849 --> 1:02:13.529 He is missing the whole sexual language which is exactly the 1:02:13.525 --> 1:02:15.445 reason, thank you. 1:02:15.449 --> 1:02:20.069 That's exactly the reason why I think that Francesca too can 1:02:20.068 --> 1:02:23.748 arguably be saved, that's exactly the reason. 1:02:23.750 --> 1:02:28.330 The term he uses is aperse, 1:02:28.329 --> 1:02:31.039 from the Italian, in Italian we call it 1:02:31.038 --> 1:02:34.508 aprire, very close to in English we 1:02:34.514 --> 1:02:39.424 have the word April, by the way, as an opening of 1:02:39.423 --> 1:02:40.303 spring. 1:02:40.300 --> 1:02:42.760 Just to give you a sense of etymology, 1:02:42.760 --> 1:02:49.420 it comes from aperire Latin which really means to 1:02:49.416 --> 1:02:53.266 generate, to bring to light, 1:02:53.268 --> 1:02:59.268 as a woman brings a birth to light and life. 1:02:59.268 --> 1:03:02.188 That's really the word, that's the meaning of the word, 1:03:02.186 --> 1:03:04.936 so it's as sexual and as productive as it can be. 1:03:04.940 --> 1:03:08.390 Before I go back though to your question about how is Dante 1:03:08.385 --> 1:03:11.675 going to-- what Dante is saying is that 1:03:11.679 --> 1:03:16.129 creation is the sexual process, the sexual experience, 1:03:16.134 --> 1:03:18.904 which is exactly what Francesca also did, 1:03:18.900 --> 1:03:21.980 breaking the law undoubtedly. 1:03:21.980 --> 1:03:24.970 She is in hell, is she going to be in hell? 1:03:24.969 --> 1:03:28.439 Are we going to understand that there is a possible continuity 1:03:28.440 --> 1:03:31.680 between what she did in a physical sense and what Dante is 1:03:31.684 --> 1:03:33.454 doing in a spiritual sense? 1:03:33.449 --> 1:03:37.669 This is the whole point of the discussion on cosmology and 1:03:37.673 --> 1:03:38.493 creation. 1:03:38.489 --> 1:03:41.179 That there is some kind of continuity between the two 1:03:41.184 --> 1:03:43.484 modes; not quite the same thing; 1:03:43.480 --> 1:03:46.580 of course, creation is a different order of experience. 1:03:46.579 --> 1:03:50.659 There is a very thin line, it's like a little breath 1:03:50.655 --> 1:03:55.445 of--breath that Francesca can release at sea--or Beatrice who 1:03:55.452 --> 1:03:57.852 goes on talking endlessly. 1:03:57.849 --> 1:04:01.639 She too, that's the difference between the two, 1:04:01.639 --> 1:04:03.679 so between the language of sexuality, 1:04:03.679 --> 1:04:05.799 of physicality in Inferno, 1:04:05.800 --> 1:04:08.390 and the language of spirituality here in 1:04:08.387 --> 1:04:11.507 Paradise, the line that is continuing 1:04:11.505 --> 1:04:15.145 between them and there is a little difference but there is 1:04:15.146 --> 1:04:17.636 also a possibility of a continuity, 1:04:17.639 --> 1:04:22.669 that's really exactly the argument that I would make about 1:04:22.672 --> 1:04:23.292 that. 1:04:23.289 --> 1:04:27.879 Let me though tell you more, in a historical way, 1:04:27.882 --> 1:04:32.862 so that if you don't agree with what I said so be it, 1:04:32.858 --> 1:04:34.388 don't worry. 1:04:34.389 --> 1:04:39.409 I don't agree with it completely on my own but I think 1:04:39.413 --> 1:04:44.253 that this--that's a radical reading of the notion of 1:04:44.246 --> 1:04:47.656 cosmology and creation in Dante. 1:04:47.659 --> 1:04:50.219 Let me tell you something else historically. 1:04:50.219 --> 1:04:54.269 Where is Dante taking these ideas from? 1:04:54.268 --> 1:04:58.298 Whenever you read commentaries on Dante, 1:04:58.300 --> 1:05:02.260 and I hope that some of you will go on reading and reading 1:05:02.259 --> 1:05:05.719 also scholars, thank you, critics--I see that 1:05:05.721 --> 1:05:10.511 nodding is just-- my heart it just gladdens when 1:05:10.510 --> 1:05:11.880 I see that. 1:05:11.880 --> 1:05:15.470 They all tell you--and I indicated that too that Dante is 1:05:15.465 --> 1:05:19.815 some kind of an Aristotelian and I was talking about metaphysics, 1:05:19.820 --> 1:05:23.740 how Aristotle calls it first philosophy, 1:05:23.739 --> 1:05:25.279 Aristotelian terms. 1:05:25.280 --> 1:05:30.070 They never tell you where the actual sources of Dante are. 1:05:30.070 --> 1:05:36.360 The sources of Dante about cosmology and cosmography are 1:05:36.355 --> 1:05:38.865 really neo-platonic. 1:05:38.869 --> 1:05:43.919 The idea of creation, especially one text that I have 1:05:43.920 --> 1:05:47.200 to mention, this guy who writes the 1:05:47.197 --> 1:05:51.777 Cosmographia called a twelfth-century man Bernard 1:05:51.782 --> 1:05:54.882 Sylvester, a Frenchman, 1:05:54.882 --> 1:06:03.102 Bernard Sylvester who writes Cosmographia, 1:06:03.099 --> 1:06:08.429 twelfth century known as the author of School of Chartres. 1:06:08.429 --> 1:06:11.779 By the way this text were available to Dante, 1:06:11.780 --> 1:06:16.810 we have a text of this man, Cosmographia, 1:06:16.809 --> 1:06:19.019 one copy only because a Florentine, 1:06:19.018 --> 1:06:23.478 later--he had it in Florence, by the name of Boccaccio, 1:06:23.480 --> 1:06:26.340 some of you know very well, he copied it down and 1:06:26.344 --> 1:06:27.544 transmitted to us. 1:06:27.539 --> 1:06:31.149 We know his handwriting because we have his texts so we know, 1:06:31.150 --> 1:06:35.940 this is 1340, Dante of course wrote about 1:06:35.940 --> 1:06:38.130 1302, but clearly that text was 1:06:38.125 --> 1:06:38.905 available then. 1:06:38.909 --> 1:06:42.159 In this text, Bernard gives an idea of 1:06:42.163 --> 1:06:46.563 creation and cosmological ideas, physical ideas. 1:06:46.559 --> 1:06:49.309 They had been reading the Timaeus in France and 1:06:49.306 --> 1:06:51.946 they were always surprised and wondering what is the 1:06:51.949 --> 1:06:54.949 difference, how can we go on having Plato 1:06:54.949 --> 1:06:59.739 say one thing about creation and Genesis saying something else? 1:06:59.739 --> 1:07:04.359 How are we going to connect these two forms, 1:07:04.360 --> 1:07:09.410 these two sources of tradition and authority? 1:07:09.409 --> 1:07:16.289 They argue, he goes on talking about the idea of a pre-existing 1:07:16.291 --> 1:07:18.291 world of matter. 1:07:18.289 --> 1:07:24.129 The natural world and a malignant materiality and how 1:07:24.125 --> 1:07:29.955 this malignant materiality is subdued into shape, 1:07:29.960 --> 1:07:34.930 and the subduing into shape is always sexual language. 1:07:34.929 --> 1:07:38.579 Matura is that which produces, 1:07:38.579 --> 1:07:43.289 generates, this is the text that I believe stands behind 1:07:43.289 --> 1:07:48.769 Dante's physical explanation of a universe which is physical, 1:07:48.768 --> 1:07:52.288 but at the same time it is not just physical. 1:07:52.289 --> 1:07:56.199 It is also a theory of creation and it's the theory of creation 1:07:56.199 --> 1:07:58.659 that has unpredictable possibilities. 1:07:58.659 --> 1:08:01.249 This tells you that things can be renewed. 1:08:01.250 --> 1:08:04.360 If you stay within the bound--you see how he criticizes 1:08:04.362 --> 1:08:06.612 the physical conception of the world. 1:08:06.610 --> 1:08:09.450 If you stay within those boundaries you can't expect 1:08:09.454 --> 1:08:11.914 anything other than what you already have. 1:08:11.909 --> 1:08:15.409 You cannot expect anymore evil or any less evil than what you 1:08:15.405 --> 1:08:16.625 already experience. 1:08:16.630 --> 1:08:20.150 The only idea, the way in which human beings 1:08:20.149 --> 1:08:24.859 can think about renewal, can think about change or 1:08:24.856 --> 1:08:30.846 freedom, or origins is only within the context of creation. 1:08:30.850 --> 1:08:34.680 That's exactly Dante's argument and that's the profound 1:08:34.680 --> 1:08:38.440 justification for the distinction between one order of 1:08:38.440 --> 1:08:42.060 experience and a different order of experience. 1:08:42.060 --> 1:08:45.640 But if this is true, and it is true for Dante, 1:08:45.640 --> 1:08:49.210 then I have to take also seriously this idea of-- 1:08:49.210 --> 1:08:52.870 this central event of redemption, which now we 1:08:52.873 --> 1:08:57.193 understand what he takes that to mean: the moment, 1:08:57.189 --> 1:08:59.789 the experience of the incarnation. 1:08:59.788 --> 1:09:03.698 This is exactly--it follows--if he has to-- 1:09:03.698 --> 1:09:05.858 if he believes that there is such a thing as-- 1:09:05.859 --> 1:09:09.189 and he does--creation then he has to believe that there is 1:09:09.194 --> 1:09:13.334 also the idea of recreation, a second creation because the 1:09:13.328 --> 1:09:18.128 first creation clearly didn't work out all that well so there 1:09:18.130 --> 1:09:20.450 is this other possibility. 1:09:20.449 --> 1:09:24.719 1:09:24.720 --> 1:09:27.540 Please. 1:09:27.538 --> 1:09:31.388 Student: I have the sense that in these lines at the 1:09:31.390 --> 1:09:34.720 beginning of XXIX that we've been talking about, 1:09:34.720 --> 1:09:40.910 that Dante is very aware of being on theological thin ice or 1:09:40.911 --> 1:09:44.691 skating close to the danger line, 1:09:44.689 --> 1:09:53.629 but the idea is the divine love spills over out into a created 1:09:53.626 --> 1:09:59.776 world so that it can be reflected back, 1:09:59.779 --> 1:10:05.139 endured, and loved in return in the way that Paolo and Francesca 1:10:05.135 --> 1:10:06.745 loved each other. 1:10:06.750 --> 1:10:14.340 That's not far from the thought that before creation God has 1:10:14.341 --> 1:10:22.451 everything but is still a little lonely and that suggests a kind 1:10:22.447 --> 1:10:27.127 of imperfection, or at least incompleteness, 1:10:27.127 --> 1:10:29.397 but how can God be incomplete? 1:10:29.399 --> 1:10:36.609 Dante begins this passage by saying, not to acquire new 1:10:36.609 --> 1:10:39.899 goodness for himself; this is the 1:10:39.896 --> 1:10:40.406 > 1:10:40.409 --> 1:10:41.879 translation, which cannot be. 1:10:41.880 --> 1:10:43.120 Prof: That's perfect. 1:10:43.118 --> 1:10:49.718 Student: That he wants to announce before he offers his 1:10:49.720 --> 1:10:55.900 neo-platonic vision of the relationship of--that God had to 1:10:55.895 --> 1:10:57.275 creation. 1:10:57.279 --> 1:11:03.029 He wants to signal his orthodoxy to doubters who might 1:11:03.033 --> 1:11:09.553 hear in this something which is less than perfectly Christian 1:11:09.548 --> 1:11:16.168 because it comes close to the idea of a needy God or a God who 1:11:16.171 --> 1:11:21.711 in the way that every lover needs something, 1:11:21.710 --> 1:11:26.140 and other to love in return, is in a predicament and 1:11:26.140 --> 1:11:31.090 creation is the solution to the predicament that God is in 1:11:31.092 --> 1:11:33.702 before the world was made. 1:11:33.698 --> 1:11:38.548 Prof: Okay, the question is that--well, 1:11:38.551 --> 1:11:44.591 the question is more of a comment by the maestro here. 1:11:44.590 --> 1:11:49.670 The comment is that Dante at the beginning of Canto XXIX 1:11:49.667 --> 1:11:53.357 seems to be on a theologically risky, 1:11:53.359 --> 1:11:56.309 on thin ice, I am quoting, 1:11:56.305 --> 1:12:00.425 because the notion of a God who-- 1:12:00.430 --> 1:12:05.950 that Dante is really trying to save his skin, 1:12:05.948 --> 1:12:11.428 as it were, by claiming a kind of theological orthodoxy when he 1:12:11.434 --> 1:12:16.564 actually knows that the very notion of creation whereby God 1:12:16.564 --> 1:12:21.944 opens up into new loves, it seems to imply that before 1:12:21.939 --> 1:12:27.169 creation God was a lonely guy looking for a partner, 1:12:27.170 --> 1:12:30.670 some kind of Adam, Adam in the garden replaces all 1:12:30.670 --> 1:12:31.170 that. 1:12:31.170 --> 1:12:32.890 That's really the question. 1:12:32.890 --> 1:12:36.400 I think that's a very interesting idea, 1:12:36.403 --> 1:12:41.673 of course, but I have to--I will respond not entirely in a 1:12:41.671 --> 1:12:46.481 funny way, but I hope it will come out as funny. 1:12:46.479 --> 1:12:50.089 It's really the question that St. 1:12:50.085 --> 1:12:54.925 Augustine asks in the Confessions. 1:12:54.930 --> 1:12:58.450 There are always those people who wonder, because that's 1:12:58.453 --> 1:13:01.663 really what the question is, what did God do before 1:13:01.657 --> 1:13:02.487 creation? 1:13:02.488 --> 1:13:02.778 St. 1:13:02.782 --> 1:13:07.462 Augustine responds: he was busy preparing hell to 1:13:07.462 --> 1:13:12.142 people like you who ask these kinds of questions, 1:13:12.144 --> 1:13:14.684 and think--that's it. 1:13:14.680 --> 1:13:21.150 The more seriously idea is that indeed creation implies, 1:13:21.149 --> 1:13:23.409 I mean that's a response that I would offer, 1:13:23.408 --> 1:13:29.098 creation implies a beginning but this creation has been going 1:13:29.097 --> 1:13:34.977 on forever and that the idea of the Trinitarian God is really a 1:13:34.976 --> 1:13:38.576 response to this problem you have. 1:13:38.578 --> 1:13:41.398 You obviously are, I think, it's not obvious but 1:13:41.399 --> 1:13:43.939 you-- to me it's not obvious I think 1:13:43.939 --> 1:13:47.969 that you are appealing to a different theological paradigm 1:13:47.970 --> 1:13:52.070 of where the unity of God can be the loneliness of God. 1:13:52.069 --> 1:13:56.959 The Christian reading of that unity is that there is always a 1:13:56.962 --> 1:14:01.452 productive, an internal life of love that always goes on 1:14:01.447 --> 1:14:03.157 producing itself. 1:14:03.158 --> 1:14:06.838 On that note of theological grandeur, I thank you and I say 1:14:06.844 --> 1:14:08.564 thank you, we'll see you. 1:14:08.560 --> 1:14:09.330 Have a good Thanksgiving. 1:14:09.329 --> 1:14:15.999