Session 18 - The badness of death, Part III; Immortality, Part I
by
jsl57
—
last modified
10-22-2009 09:41 AM
—
filed under:
Bernard Williams,
Derek Parfit,
Plato,
Immortality,
deprivation account theory,
Fred Feldman,
Jonathan Swift,
Lucretius,
Tom Nagle,
Bedazzled,
Montaigne,
Gulliver’s Travels
The discussion of the badness of death continues by asking whether it is bad that we do not exist before our birth. The views of a number of contemporary philosophers, such as Tom Nagle, Fred Feldman, and Derek Parfit, are introduced. Then Professor Kagan turns to the subject of immortality. Would it be desirable to live forever, and if so, under what circumstances one might enjoy such a prolonged existence? The lecture concludes with Bernard Williams' take on immortality which posits that no kind of human life can continue to be enjoyable and attractive for eternity. PHIL 176: Death
Overview:The discussion of the badness of death continues by asking whether it is bad that we do not exist before our birth. The views of a number of contemporary philosophers, such as Tom Nagle, Fred Feldman, and Derek Parfit, are introduced. Then Professor Kagan turns to the subject of immortality. Would it be desirable to live forever, and if so, under what circumstances one might enjoy such a prolonged existence? The lecture concludes with Bernard Williams' take on immortality which posits that no kind of human life can continue to be enjoyable and attractive for eternity. Reading assignment:Montaigne, Michel de. "That to Philosophize is to Learn to Die" In The Complete Essays. Swift, Jonathan. Gulliver's Travels, Part III, chapter 10. Williams, Bernard. "The Makropulos Case: Reflections on the Tedium of Immortality." In Language, Metaphysics, and Death. Edited by John Donnelly. New York: Fordham University Press, 1978. pp. 229-242
|
